Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37  
Old 06-24-2012, 10:46 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
You claim to be a pilot but do not seem to understand these basic facts.
No claims, it's all been proven.

Quote:
Robteks first post in this thread was spot on.
Actually I can agree, but I only decided to question the sudden conviction to the theory it was all about the difference between IAS and TAS, really it doesn't matter who calibrates how, like I mentioned a simple 'rule of thumb' calculation gives a pretty accurate result, I'm sure the Russians had thumbs too (even opposeable ones) the compressibility effects you talked about were really geared around transonic flight, given the anecdote was in all probability talking about more mainstream German aircraft i.e. the piston engined ones then theres not too much chance the data you provided was applicable.

Quote:
The other damning fact is that all instruments, manifold pressure, rpm, airspeed indicators, altimeter, etc...require both periodic maintenance and calibration.

Damming? how so? what makes you think the Russians were incapable of giving captured machines any maintenance, actually as a pilot i can tell you that instruments barely ever 'need' maintenance, sure they get checked for obvious reasons but seldom do they loose calibration.

Quote:
I just took the opportunity to demonstrate the following to the community.
you demonstrated something? appart from the usual internet trawled stuff and equations which I have to admit were barely readable I saw no demonstrations of anything relevant.

Quote:
Instead you leap on the anecdotal bandwagon because it is something you think will advance your game shape agenda.
My 'gameshape agenda' as you put it is towards accuracy.

Quote:
It is no different than the ridiculous "testing" of performance without first understanding the atmospheric conditions.
Which I did....youre welcome by the way.

Quote:
Both incident's are example of behavior that folks who understand aircraft performance would not undertake!! Like I did, they would think it is a very silly thing to do.
Yeah, your specialty, sitting on the sidelines thinking evryone else is stupid.

Quote:
My suggestion is less whining from the community about specific aircraft performance to fit an agenda and more enjoyment of the game.
From a guy who whinges about aircraft performance and barely plays the game....
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.