![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yes the DM is actually pretty good in DCS.
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No competition for CoD.
DCS P-51 is a fine time waster and nothing more. I do wish CoD has its complexity. But other than that DCS P-51 is like a wall poster for me. DM today is very disappointing if you expect it anything close to CoD because it isn't. Not at all. Last edited by ATAG_Doc; 06-24-2012 at 09:11 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
That being said, MG can forget about selling BoM to me before they have working radio coms, believeable AI, working bombing sights and an easy to use coop mode built in. I support Adonys' request for weekly updates via torrents. Of course it will not happen, but I like the idea. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Question is: will you buy the sequel if it does have working radio coms, believeable AI, working bombing sights and an easy to use coop mode built in, plus a flyable FW-190, while CloD stays as broken as it is?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well I'm going to buy BOM, I paid $50 for COD( I think,it was a while ago now ) and a few hundred hours later I still enjoy it a fair bit ( although not at the moment as I'm oversea's) , granted it's certainly far from perfect and having a decent rig helps to no end, but for what I've paid for it which is easily less then I'd spend in an hour on a night out on the town, I think I've gotten heaps of fun and entertainment out of it, definitely more then the 50 bucks worth paid I for it.
But then again I've always thought my cup was half full. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And you went out on a night out to know how much entertainment a man gets for a 50 quid
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh yes, purely to compare value of course, and to make it accurate I went out for about 8 hours to get a proper average
![]() Turns out 50 bucks n hour doesn't get ya a lot, now 200 bucks............ ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Easy answer is: yes.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
What matters to me when it comes to BoM is the reviews it gets after launch, and whether or not the concept of it is interesting enough. If it is, I'll buy it. If it gets slammed in reviews, I'll wait for 6 months and then see how things are. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For the many hundreds of hours -- according to Steam stats -- of entertainment that CoD has given me, the sim owes me nothing for the 50 bucks I paid for it. However, I'm not complacent with its current state since much is needed to be done to fix it right. Although the BoM front is not a personal preference, I will buy it when available even if it doesn't retroactively upgrade CoD. However, based on MG's track record with 1946, I'd give it a better than average chance that it will.
__________________
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|