Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover
Reload this Page Blacksix can you explane!
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-21-2012, 12:03 PM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aer9o View Post
We have an overwhelming majority of customers (please check the recent poll) here who think DirectX9 should not interfere or delay regular and much needed patching. Some people think this feature should not be supported at all as it is outdated! Why developers are not considering customer whishes and requirements?

The recent poll was bias and loaded to elicit the creators desired out come. People like myself could not participate because of its use of compound criteria.

There are a lot of sites on the internet about creating unbiased surveys and questionnaires

The polls creator should visit a few of those and make a new poll that could be used to accurately gauge the community’s wishes.
  #2  
Old 06-21-2012, 12:07 PM
Aer9o Aer9o is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 179
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger View Post
The recent poll was bias and loaded to elicit the creators desired out come. People like myself could not participate because of its use of compound criteria.

There are a lot of sites on the internet about creating unbiased surveys and questionnaires

The polls creator should visit a few of those and make a new poll that could be used to accurately gauge the community’s wishes.
With all due respect, the question is not addressed to you! However 300 people voted ...that is an indication that is nothing fundamentally wrong with the Poll! If you do not want to vote this is ok , it`s your choice!
  #3  
Old 06-21-2012, 01:51 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aer9o View Post
However 300 people voted ...that is an indication that is nothing fundamentally wrong with the Poll!
The only thing that indicates is that there were 300 people in here who wasted their time responding to a pointless, and flawed, poll.
  #4  
Old 06-21-2012, 02:35 PM
Kongo-Otto's Avatar
Kongo-Otto Kongo-Otto is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Posts: 391
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aer9o View Post
With all due respect, the question is not addressed to you! However 300 people voted ...that is an indication that is nothing fundamentally wrong with the Poll! If you do not want to vote this is ok , it`s your choice!
  #5  
Old 06-21-2012, 08:43 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aer9o View Post
However 300 people voted ...that is an indication that is nothing fundamentally wrong with the Poll!
Error..
Error..
Error..
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.