![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: Do you use or intend to use DirectX 9? | |||
| No I do not and I don`t think it should be supported at this stage anymore |
|
254 | 90.07% |
| Yes I do and will do so in the future |
|
28 | 9.93% |
| Voters: 282. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hopefully they will drop support for it in BoM so things can progress at a faster pace without worrying too much about "extreme" backwards compatibility. I'm only going on my own opinion which is that DX9 support is a bit of a waste of time since it doesn't benefit the majority, but I can appreciate and understand the flipside. My only question remaining is more out of personal curiosity: has anyone actually gotten the game to run relatively well on a DX9 machine? I can't imagine my PC from ~6 years ago handling this and that was a pretty high spec machine: heck even my current machine has it's moments where it strains and I've built a pretty cutting edge machine for CloD. V |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
the question about those 15% of DX9 users shouldn't be about suffering.. but about loses..
how many of the other 85% they are losing while spending time on ironing out the DX9 instead completing DX10 (or even DX11 for that matter) and adding new features? and how many potential customers they are losing while working on DX9, instead adding more DX10/DX11 shiny graphics effects which could convince them to buy the IL2CoD/BoM?!! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
totally futile...
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is 7% thus far. 14 of 202. Stunning nevertheless. You'd think it be prudent to give the masses what they desire now and add DX9 support as a deliverable.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, I think the word you are looking for is 'infantile'. Start a poll with loaded answers on a question we can't answer because we don't have the necessary information (contractual obligations, market research etc, not to mention just how much work is actually involved in supporting DX9), and then when anyone points out that the poll is flawed and pointless, ignore it, and carry on with the same old "we don't want DX9" whining. Tough. It isn't your decision - and the developers would be ill-advised to take any notice of the small numbers who actually post on the forum anyway. If the potential CloD market was restricted to those who spend their time griping on the forum, the developers would be best advised to look for another job - but fortunately, it isn't. Frankly, starting pointless polls like this does nothing for CloD, and merely adds to the general air of negativity on the forum. I can't see why the moderators don't just put a stop to such nonsense, and lock meaningless threads like this. 1C have said they are supporting DX9, and that is all we need to know...
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|