could relativity proof have been falsified?

[SEE]

Refraction of light through a gas and liquids is caused by a change of speed. We see a 'rainbow' effect because each wavelength (in the spectrum of light) the speed is affected differently and splits.

However, If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by SEE

If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.

not what they found out its a star was out of place in an eclipse

as a pencil point is out of place when in water and gets refracted

point one:
they couldnt account for suns atmosphere refraction

point two:

they couldnt account for earths atmosphere refraction that varies with the angle

point 3:

they could account on the solar winds refraction

point 4:

they couldnt account on the milky way stellar dust refraction

without acounting this all they were able to conclude a star moved position by gravitational lensing confirming CAUSALITY and making a guy totally unable for maths in school and with a very low IQ according the tests the most intelligent man of mans history, oh and confirming causality which confirms we are just predictable machines with no soul nor free will just as stones so if eisntein was a psicological mistreater it was not his fault, just as guilty as a stone which falls and kills someone

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by SEE

Refraction of light through a gas and liquids is caused by a change of speed. We see a 'rainbow' effect because each wavelength (in the spectrum of light) the speed is affected differently and splits.

However, If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.

check out this refraction in which theres no cromatic aberration



cromatic aberration or rainbow efect is just a minor part of refraction

the main problem with refraction is it moves stars, it has to be taken into acount with celestial navigation and it grows as stars get close to the horizon

in other words the rainbow effect caused by the atmosphere refracting starlight is neglible compared with the change of position of the star caused by that refraction