could relativity proof have been falsified?

[raaaid]

yes the problem is what info is to trust?

i need to know not high maths to know relativity proof of the sun gravity bending the starlight is TOTALLY invalid because is expected sun atmosphere will do that

are they hiding light is instant because doesnt bend and tt is posible?

why am i being lied so badly?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64Oh3qEVgBQ

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

yes the problem is what info is to trust?

i need to know not high maths to know relativity proof of the sun gravity bending the starlight is TOTALLY invalid because is expected sun atmosphere will do that

OK, if that's the case, PROVE it. How much will the sun's atmosphere bend the light and is that what was observed?

--Outlaw.

[raaaid]

i dont know as eisntein didnt know for not knowing thickness and density of suns atmosphere

they did it as if the sun had no atmosphere at all

the starlight moved so it was concluded it was gravity period, what about the atmosphere

[GraveyardJimmy]

Originally Posted by raaaid

are they hiding light is instant because doesnt bend and tt is posible?

Raaaid, if light is instant then how could it refract? Refraction occurs due to differing speeds of the light.

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by GraveyardJimmy

Raaaid, if light is instant then how could it refract? Refraction occurs due to differing speeds of the light.

if that was true then negative refraction would implied negative refracted light is faster than normal light

refraction is very misterious i dont take mainstream interpretation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_refraction

edit:

anyway the only prove i have light is instant and therefore cause and affect is simultaneous allowing tt is that the bending of light that proves light is slow is false because of sun atmosphere refraction

if something is fake the opposite is truth

[SEE]

Refraction of light through a gas and liquids is caused by a change of speed. We see a 'rainbow' effect because each wavelength (in the spectrum of light) the speed is affected differently and splits.

However, If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by SEE

If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.

not what they found out its a star was out of place in an eclipse

as a pencil point is out of place when in water and gets refracted

point one:
they couldnt account for suns atmosphere refraction

point two:

they couldnt account for earths atmosphere refraction that varies with the angle

point 3:

they could account on the solar winds refraction

point 4:

they couldnt account on the milky way stellar dust refraction

without acounting this all they were able to conclude a star moved position by gravitational lensing confirming CAUSALITY and making a guy totally unable for maths in school and with a very low IQ according the tests the most intelligent man of mans history, oh and confirming causality which confirms we are just predictable machines with no soul nor free will just as stones so if eisntein was a psicological mistreater it was not his fault, just as guilty as a stone which falls and kills someone

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by SEE

Refraction of light through a gas and liquids is caused by a change of speed. We see a 'rainbow' effect because each wavelength (in the spectrum of light) the speed is affected differently and splits.

However, If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.

check out this refraction in which theres no cromatic aberration



cromatic aberration or rainbow efect is just a minor part of refraction

the main problem with refraction is it moves stars, it has to be taken into acount with celestial navigation and it grows as stars get close to the horizon

in other words the rainbow effect caused by the atmosphere refracting starlight is neglible compared with the change of position of the star caused by that refraction

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

anyway the only prove i have light is instant and therefore cause and affect is simultaneous allowing tt is that the bending of light that proves light is slow is false because of sun atmosphere refraction

The above is a totally worthless and completely useless statement.

You can't PROVE anything. You THINK that atmospheric refraction should account for the bending. That's it, nothing more.

Why won't you show the observed refraction versus the calculated refraction?

--Outlaw.

[raaaid]

einstein predicted the position of an star which was out of place due to space curving which he predicted with exactitude

the fact i cant know what starlight bending is expected from suns atmosphere is the very same problem eisntin had to face

i wont turn it the other way around and tell you to show me einstein calculations on sun atmosphere starbending

everything is a pantomine the blue screen on tv is massive

do you know what i think the future is now?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17680904



edit:

how did eisntein account for this:

Light refraction by the Sun's atmosphere is calculated.As detected from the Earth, the refraction can deflect a light ray emitted from the Sun's limb by 13 arcseconds or a starlight ray grazing the solar limb by 26, an effect 15 times larger than the gravitational deflection.

edit:

check out this huge chromatic aberration caused by refracted light:



i take the impostors of this world seriously no more, they are just some crooks with no class, i foresee a peacefull revolution and they exposed for the low crooks they are