Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2012, 11:33 AM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Cancelled the chicks, beer and football won I am afraid. But hey dude, you know where I am from, so then you know we absolutely highest quality chicks here. Need proof? These girls are not models but ordinary girls sending in their pictures. DIE OF ENVY, ENGLISHMAN, LOL.
http://www.szeretlekmagyarorszag.hu/category/szepsegek/

Sorry for the off.
No worries - Hungarian girls are very pretty indeed. So are ours (Slovakia - pretty similar actually). I live in England and the moment and there are many many beautiful girls in here, too. And I mean BEAUTIFUL mate...

Back to the topic - my concern re. 100 octane fuel for Mk.I fighters is in the Rotol propeller variant, that's at least what has been announced - 100 octane for CSP. I wonder if this is entirely correct, because from what I've known, there were still quite a few de Havilland fighters around during the summer period. I'd say that we need both propellers and 100 octanes for BofB. 87 octanes for anything representing OTUs and some 1939 scanarios. What do you guys think?
__________________
Bobika.
  #2  
Old 06-10-2012, 11:50 AM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
No worries - Hungarian girls are very pretty indeed. So are ours (Slovakia - pretty similar actually). I live in England and the moment and there are many many beautiful girls in here, too. And I mean BEAUTIFUL mate...

Back to the topic - my concern re. 100 octane fuel for Mk.I fighters is in the Rotol propeller variant, that's at least what has been announced - 100 octane for CSP. I wonder if this is entirely correct, because from what I've known, there were still quite a few de Havilland fighters around during the summer period. I'd say that we need both propellers and 100 octanes for BofB. 87 octanes for anything representing OTUs and some 1939 scanarios. What do you guys think?
Maybe but this would lead to have 3 to 4 mk1 variants instead of 2, so perhaps asked to much when on online maps they will likely put the csp spit anyhow.
  #3  
Old 06-10-2012, 12:01 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Stormcrow View Post
Maybe but this would lead to have 3 to 4 mk1 variants instead of 2, so perhaps asked to much when on online maps they will likely put the csp spit anyhow.
True, but it's not really necessary to have a new slot for each and every variant, is it? Commons sense would say 2 slots with 2 different 3d models (Rotol and de Havilland) and choice of 87 / 100 octane in the armament screen. Appropriate FM file would be the used depending of which box is ticked. Mission creator would enable / disable the option for the player. 100 octane was for BofB, 87 for any 1939 scenarios.

I might be wrong though, the Rotol conversion was pretty swift, well known story. But many Spitfires flew with 2-pitch during that era - guessng from pilot's memories and photographs.
__________________
Bobika.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.