Bug 174 on 12lbs boost. Review please.

[Glider]

Training schools didn't have 100 octane that was always the intention.

Remembering Crumpp insistance that the changes required to the aircraft/engine were extensive, its interesting to note how quickly the change over took place. On 15th Feb the squadron was released but found time to take part in some practice missions, drain the tanks for 100 Octane and the next day the squadron was available. Its also worth noting that Drem is a small satallite station with a limited infrastructure apart from day to day maintanence and fairly simple repair facilities.

[bongodriver]

Glider remember we are talking RAF here, they had to figure out which way to turn the spanner to take out the spark plugs

[Glider]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

Glider remember we are talking RAF here, they had to figure out which way to turn the spanner to take out the spark plugs

True story. I did a five year apprenticeship in the FAA in the early 70’s. Part way through the third year of the course by which time it’s fair to say that while far from being qualified, we didn’t count ourselves as being totally without skills. We had to do a whole day session on how to use a hammer. The instructor recognised that this was stupid, signed us off as having passed and let us catch up on revision, homework etc. So as they say, anything is possible

[Kurfürst]

People should know when they are conquered.

[Seadog]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

People should know when they are conquered.

Yeah, but don't take it too hard.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

People should know when they are conquered.

They did a long time ago. But thanks for making all of the real historians pull out hard evidence to nail the coffin lid down on your fantasy.

[Kurfürst]

Originally Posted by Osprey

They did a long time ago. But thanks for making all of the real historians pull out hard evidence to nail the coffin lid down on your fantasy.

Well unfortunately for you it was you who have argued that there were absolutely no Spitfires and Hurricanes flying with 87 octane fuel, they should not be in the sim, as you have claimed that the only ones ever flying were all 100 octane ones.

You wanted to enforce this fantasy on all others, and wanted that 1C should only model RAF fighters on 100 octane, and deprieve all others to have choice wheter to believe your fantasies or not.

The rest of us were deeply sceptical of your story. We've believed, and still believe of course that both RAF fighters were fueled by both 87 octane and 100 octane, depending on the station, and this was supported by massive evidence.

In the end, most of the 1C community and 1C developers took the more sensible, more realistic position that was well supported by the actual documentation and uniformly shared by respected authors.

They've acknowledged that the evidence for your story was unconvincing and insufficient, and I am sure after careful inspection of the available documents come to the same conclusion as the rest of us, that both 87 and 100 octane models were present in the Battle. They have ignored your revisionist version of history. Accordinly, and true to the historical reality, they have modelled both versions, which every ones of us, expect you and a handful of fanatics, has supported all the way along.


Twitch all you want about it, but you have lost and failed in your agenda.

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

Well unfortunately for you it was you who have argued that there were absolutely no Spitfires and Hurricanes flying with 87 octane fuel, they should not be in the sim, as you have claimed that the only ones ever flying were all 100 octane ones.

Ha ha it's funny watching you misquote me and do you selective editing. Just to correct your LIES, I support 87 octane in game, just want the 100 available, because the only fighters fighting in 11 group mapped in game were using 100 octane. But you could always learn the FMB and turn off your Steam updates so you'll have an easy time online and live your dream that Hitler won the war.

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

You wanted to enforce this fantasy on all others, and wanted that 1C should only model RAF fighters on 100 octane, and deprieve all others to have choice wheter to believe your fantasies or not.

The important thing is that your big lie was destroyed. I noticed that you said "Game Over", which means that your agenda wasn't historically based but rather that you're a crappy pilot who needs false advantages in game. I bet when you play FIFA on PS3 you turn off the red cards so you can foul the opposition lol

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

The rest of us were deeply sceptical of your story. We've believed, and still believe of course that both RAF fighters were fueled by both 87 octane and 100 octane, depending on the station, and this was supported by massive evidence.

You mean you and Crumpp. We are talking about you, an extremist fanatic, and Crumpp, an 'advisor to the experts' who is willing to argue his case regardless of how obvious to everybody else that he is wrong. "Massive evidence" - LMAO!!!

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

In the end, most of the 1C community and 1C developers took the more sensible, more realistic position that was well supported by the actual documentation and uniformly shared by respected authors.

Indeed they were sensible enough to disagree with you. You admitted defeat remember.......JAT

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

They've acknowledged that the evidence for your story was unconvincing and insufficient, and I am sure after careful inspection of the available documents come to the same conclusion as the rest of us, that both 87 and 100 octane models were present in the Battle. They have ignored your revisionist version of history. Accordinly, and true to the historical reality, they have modelled both versions, which every ones of us, expect you and a handful of fanatics, has supported all the way along.

If you can get Luthier or Black Six to agree with this I'll eat my rudder pedals.

Originally Posted by Kurfürst

Twitch all you want about it, but you have lost and failed in your agenda.

That must be why I posted this when the update was announced.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...9&postcount=33

Huzzah for 100 octane!!

[KG26_Alpha]

You should congratulate yourselves on getting another thread locked
well done.