![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
BTW, I'm pretty sure that climatologists did not ignore the sun as a possible cause. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually a lot of models Freeman Dyson was on about, which you discredited out of hand, didn't factor in the sun's output, the clouds, dust in the atmosphere, the carbon sinks and the general biomass of the planet.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Computer models are not the only evidence of global warming. They are nothing but a tool to try to predict how bad it will get. Again, Dyson is NOT an expert. Stop trolling.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Listen mate the only one trolling is now you ................. call me that again and I'll report you to the mods ........
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting. So it's ok for you to call me a troll, but I can't do the same to you?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
You bleedin started it mate ................ and I'm not, never have or will troll. Period. But what gets me is you constantly calling me one .................
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Really? Look at page 7.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
the earth is a closed system. 3 forms matter -> liquid, solid gas. the supply of carbon-> finite. we burn the carbon. it goes from liquid (petrol/oil) to gas CO2. Plants absorb the carbon gas and the carbon turns into solid. it is really lame such simple concept that I learned in preschool has been a bastardized and manipulated into one of the greatest frauds in human history. the phd jump in an say, well, its the ratio that will destroy the planet and end civilization. no, it doesn't matter. you are fraud shitzter trying to exploit, mr phd. go read "limits to growth" that came out in 1970. stupidest book on the planet. even if it is warming, for whatever reason, this means even more plants to absorb the carbon and new equilibrium because the system is closed. everyone go plant a lawn or garden if your that worried about it. stop spreading lies and deviance. my last words on this.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|