Man Made Global Warming

[5./JG27.Farber]

Yea but volcanoes emit clossal amounts compared to people...



Thats 1 Volcano ^


So at first look you think - Holy ****! Those planes! Then you think, Hang on... How many active volcanoes in the world? Theres only Europe!

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

Yea but volcanoes emit clossal amounts compared to people...

You seem to be missing the point (no surprise there). The temp is rising. That means there is a source that is increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. If volcanic activity is not increasing, the CO2 must be coming from somewhere else.

[AndyJWest]

David, I think you're wasting your time here. This lot are not only ignorant, but proud of it...

[Walshy]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

You seem to be missing the point (no surprise there). The temp is rising. That means there is a source that is increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. If volcanic activity is not increasing, the CO2 must be coming from somewhere else.

The sun yes ......................... and still no post from you showing your evidence that definitively puts man as the culprit .................

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Walshy

The sun yes ......................... and still no post from you showing your evidence that definitively puts man as the culprit .................

This isn't science class and I'm not your teacher. You'll have to look up the evidence ion your own. I'm just telling you what the scientific consensus is.

BTW, I'm pretty sure that climatologists did not ignore the sun as a possible cause.

[Walshy]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

This isn't science class and I'm not your teacher. You'll have to look up the evidence ion your own. I'm just telling you what the scientific consensus is.

BTW, I'm pretty sure that climatologists did not ignore the sun as a possible cause.

Actually a lot of models Freeman Dyson was on about, which you discredited out of hand, didn't factor in the sun's output, the clouds, dust in the atmosphere, the carbon sinks and the general biomass of the planet.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Walshy

Actually a lot of models Freeman Dyson was on about, which you discredited out of hand, didn't factor in the sun's output, the clouds, dust in the atmosphere, the carbon sinks and the general biomass of the planet.

Computer models are not the only evidence of global warming. They are nothing but a tool to try to predict how bad it will get. Again, Dyson is NOT an expert. Stop trolling.

[Walshy]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Computer models are not the only evidence of global warming. They are nothing but a tool to try to predict how bad it will get. Again, Dyson is NOT an expert. Stop trolling.

Listen mate the only one trolling is now you ................. call me that again and I'll report you to the mods ........

[MadBlaster]

the earth is a closed system. 3 forms matter -> liquid, solid gas. the supply of carbon-> finite. we burn the carbon. it goes from liquid (petrol/oil) to gas CO2. Plants absorb the carbon gas and the carbon turns into solid. it is really lame such simple concept that I learned in preschool has been a bastardized and manipulated into one of the greatest frauds in human history. the phd jump in an say, well, its the ratio that will destroy the planet and end civilization. no, it doesn't matter. you are fraud shitzter trying to exploit, mr phd. go read "limits to growth" that came out in 1970. stupidest book on the planet. even if it is warming, for whatever reason, this means even more plants to absorb the carbon and new equilibrium because the system is closed. everyone go plant a lawn or garden if your that worried about it. stop spreading lies and deviance. my last words on this.

[WTE_Galway]

My (slightly mad messsianic christian) ex-girlfriend is doing a masters in sustainable agricultural which according to the standards of this thread makes her a climate expert.

Now according to her if Climate Change was real then God would have mentioned it in the bible. Furthermore science got evolution totally wrong so how can we trust it on climate change.

She is also unhappy climate change legislation may cost her money so she is generally opposed to it on principle.