Man Made Global Warming

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

More than all of the man made sources put together according to the documentary i put up, which by the way was made by channel 4 and was aired very ealy in the morning, 03:00 Hrs if I recall... I remember having to stay up to watch it.

That would be a great argument against humans being responsible, except that volcanic activity has not increased. So that ain't it.

[5./JG27.Farber]

Yea but volcanoes emit clossal amounts compared to people...



Thats 1 Volcano ^


So at first look you think - Holy ****! Those planes! Then you think, Hang on... How many active volcanoes in the world? Theres only Europe!

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber

Yea but volcanoes emit clossal amounts compared to people...

You seem to be missing the point (no surprise there). The temp is rising. That means there is a source that is increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. If volcanic activity is not increasing, the CO2 must be coming from somewhere else.

[AndyJWest]

David, I think you're wasting your time here. This lot are not only ignorant, but proud of it...

[Walshy]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

You seem to be missing the point (no surprise there). The temp is rising. That means there is a source that is increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. If volcanic activity is not increasing, the CO2 must be coming from somewhere else.

The sun yes ......................... and still no post from you showing your evidence that definitively puts man as the culprit .................

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Walshy

The sun yes ......................... and still no post from you showing your evidence that definitively puts man as the culprit .................

This isn't science class and I'm not your teacher. You'll have to look up the evidence ion your own. I'm just telling you what the scientific consensus is.

BTW, I'm pretty sure that climatologists did not ignore the sun as a possible cause.

[Walshy]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

This isn't science class and I'm not your teacher. You'll have to look up the evidence ion your own. I'm just telling you what the scientific consensus is.

BTW, I'm pretty sure that climatologists did not ignore the sun as a possible cause.

Actually a lot of models Freeman Dyson was on about, which you discredited out of hand, didn't factor in the sun's output, the clouds, dust in the atmosphere, the carbon sinks and the general biomass of the planet.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Walshy

Actually a lot of models Freeman Dyson was on about, which you discredited out of hand, didn't factor in the sun's output, the clouds, dust in the atmosphere, the carbon sinks and the general biomass of the planet.

Computer models are not the only evidence of global warming. They are nothing but a tool to try to predict how bad it will get. Again, Dyson is NOT an expert. Stop trolling.

[WTE_Galway]

My (slightly mad messsianic christian) ex-girlfriend is doing a masters in sustainable agricultural which according to the standards of this thread makes her a climate expert.

Now according to her if Climate Change was real then God would have mentioned it in the bible. Furthermore science got evolution totally wrong so how can we trust it on climate change.

She is also unhappy climate change legislation may cost her money so she is generally opposed to it on principle.

[AndyJWest]

slightly mad

Only 'slightly'?