Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2012, 12:16 AM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadog View Post
Pulling the boost override with 87 octane would be equivalent to committing suicide; even if the engine didn't fail immediately, it would lose power due to premature detonation. Why in God's name would any sane pilot "pull the plug" if it resulted in loss of performance?

Yet, in all the combat reports of the pilots pulling the plug, the aircraft responded with increased performance; there are no reports where the engine began to suffer detonation and/or failed...
Probably because they never had the good fortune to make a combat report.



The ridiculous arguments are valid of course, as everyone has thier opinion of how it should be in CoD.

None of it matters because as soon as the RAF get 100 octane there will be a new axe to grind here.

Most likely ammunition effectiveness with a forum full of graphs and charts showing pretty much what we have now,
peoples opinions on how CoD should be.


Carry On







.

Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 05-18-2012 at 12:24 AM.
  #2  
Old 05-18-2012, 02:09 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KG26_Alpha View Post
Probably because they never had the good fortune to make a combat report.

The ridiculous arguments are valid of course, as everyone has thier opinion of how it should be in CoD.
Actually not a "ridiculous argument" because detonation would have been a serious possibility had pilots tried to use +12 lbs override boost with 87 Octane, which did not have the anti-knock properties of 100 Octane. The engine might not have failed right away but it would certainly have been damaged and the pilot given a boot up the backside by the mechanics.

This is one of the absurdities of Crumpp's argument that somehow most of the Merlins used in frontline fighters during the Battle of Britain were restricted to using 87 Octane fuel - Hugh Dowding would not have been complaining to all Groups, Stations and Squadrons about pilots overusing +12 lbs boost, he would have been reminding pilots to never use +12 lbs boost under any circumstances, unless they belonged to the select few units permitted to use 100 Octane and +12 lbs boost.

  #3  
Old 05-18-2012, 02:37 AM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
Actually not a "ridiculous argument"
It was with reference to Klems post

I said they were valid.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.