Inaccurate performance data for BOB fighters in COD comparing to RL data

[ATAG_Snapper]

Originally Posted by lane

Yes, the historical record shows that in March 1939 when the planners were looking at converting 16 fighter squadrons to 100 octane, there were in fact only 16 operational squadrons (+/- 1) equipped with Hurricanes or Spitfires.

Mystery of the 16 squadrons solved.

Now the 1C devs can feel free to give our Spits and Hurries their badly-needed and much-deserved +12 lbs of overboost and resulting emergency 5 minutes or so 30 mph increase in top speed. The sooner the better - a "hotfix #2" would be just the ticket!!!!

[robtek]

I am all for it, but only if there are felt penalties for abusing/overboosting the engines of all sides longer as rated!!!

Like loosing power slowly or better a increased chance of throwing a rod or something like that, this combined with corrected oil and water temperature changes.

[fruitbat]

Originally Posted by robtek

I am all for it, but only if there are felt penalties for abusing/overboosting the engines of all sides longer as rated!!!

Like loosing power slowly or better a increased chance of throwing a rod or something like that, this combined with corrected oil and water temperature changes.

agreed.

[TomcatViP]

30MPH extra speed only ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

why not 300mph ?

[ATAG_Snapper]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

30MPH extra speed only ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

why not 300mph ?

http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/174

Where have YOU been?

[ATAG_Snapper]

Originally Posted by robtek

I am all for it, but only if there are felt penalties for abusing/overboosting the engines of all sides longer as rated!!!

Like loosing power slowly or better a increased chance of throwing a rod or something like that, this combined with corrected oil and water temperature changes.

+1