![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fixed that post for yer...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
With regards to the DCS engine/landscape, I bought Flanker 2.0 (which I think Lock On/FC are based on) back in 2k and just remember how blown away I was running such a good looking sim -both aircraft models and landscape- on my Celeron 500MHz/196MB RAM/Voodoo 3 16MB rig. Also the manual that came with it, thick as a brick, was amazing. In conclusion, yes the Flanker/LockOn/FC/DCS engine has aged very gracefully and has always scaled well, I hope the same for CloD.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Agreed 100%
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
SALUTE.. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by addman; 05-12-2012 at 02:29 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Old times... Flanker 1.0 anyone?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Been there done that.. See my post above!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|