Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Performance Poll BETA PATCH v1.06.17582
Better performance 131 48.16%
Similar performance 81 29.78%
Worse performance 60 22.06%
Voters: 272. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-2012, 10:27 AM
TonyD TonyD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jozi, SA
Posts: 263
Default

I’ve had a similar experience – apart from a huge increase in frame rates, setting the graphics from my previous lower settings to everything on ‘High’ caused a loss of 4fps in Black Death (46 to 42). I wonder how many that have responded ‘Similar performance’ have not picked up on this?
__________________
I'd rather be flying ...

Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 | AMD FX-8350 | MSI HD7970 TFOC-BE | 8GB Corsair DDR-III 1866 | Win8.1 Pro 64-bit
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2012, 10:34 AM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyD View Post
I’ve had a similar experience – apart from a huge increase in frame rates, setting the graphics from my previous lower settings to everything on ‘High’ caused a loss of 4fps in Black Death (46 to 42). I wonder how many that have responded ‘Similar performance’ have not picked up on this?
Including me Thats only natural, first you do is to test the new version under the same conditions as the old one -> ergo runnging Black Death Track or sth. similar under the SAME settings. Therefore I didnt see much of a difference.

Try it out guys, just set the options a little higher, compare and you will see!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2012, 01:17 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by III/JG53_Don View Post
Including me Thats only natural, first you do is to test the new version under the same conditions as the old one -> ergo runnging Black Death Track or sth. similar under the SAME settings. Therefore I didnt see much of a difference.

Try it out guys, just set the options a little higher, compare and you will see!
Just be very careful using the Black Death track, BlackDog suggested that it gives very erratic performances, because it has been recorded on a previous version. I had indeed worse performance and freezes with it after the patch.

forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpost.php?p=419696&postcount=146

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-08-2012, 01:52 PM
Lurker_71 Lurker_71 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyD View Post
I’ve had a similar experience – apart from a huge increase in frame rates, setting the graphics from my previous lower settings to everything on ‘High’ caused a loss of 4fps in Black Death (46 to 42). I wonder how many that have responded ‘Similar performance’ have not picked up on this?
If what you say is a fact, then in my opinion that just shows that higher settings do not improve visual quality (another bug to fix perhaps). Quality must come at a cost. But then I appreciate the good feeling that comes with thinking you're running the sim at "high."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:37 PM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Believe it or not, but the settings are higher in fact. I can clearly see sharper edges due to AA 4x and the difference between Texturesize High to Original. On Original you can easily read the german text of the 109s wing "Nicht betreten" from your cockpit view whereas with setting just to "high" these words are much more blurry and pretty hard to read.
Apart from that the distance of the house block building increased a lot.

Of course there are more stutters with these settings than I had before but nothing drastic. And I hope that the devs can fix that with optimising grass and trees.
I just dunt know what effect it will have when the weathering textures, distant clouds and some particle effects are back in the game. Wait and see!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-08-2012, 03:11 PM
JG5_emil's Avatar
JG5_emil JG5_emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 331
Default

One of our guys swears blind that he is getting AA when it is switched off in game but no AA when it is turned on. He has an ATI card I think.
__________________

Intel Core i5-2500K @ 4.20GHz
Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Z68
Kingston HyperX Genesis Grey 2x4GB DDR3 PC3-1280
Intel 510 ElmCrest SSD 120GB
GeForce GTX 580 3072MB
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit
Corsair HX1050 PSU
Corsair Hydro H80 CPU Cooler
Silverstone Fortress 2
Hazro HZ27WA 27" 2560x1440
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2012, 04:44 AM
SQB SQB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG5_emil View Post
One of our guys swears blind that he is getting AA when it is switched off in game but no AA when it is turned on. He has an ATI card I think.
Same here! I'm getting AA for sure with settings off, turning AA on 2x increased FPS and jaggies. I prefer AA off so I'm flying with the setting on 2x at the moment, slightly weird.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-08-2012, 03:25 PM
GothicGhost GothicGhost is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 16
Default

Using ATI 5870 and I just updated to the 12.4 drivers.

My fps went from 30ish to over 60ish in the cockpit view

I still have to turn most ground settings on medium settings to keep the 5870 memory under 1GB

If the 1GB limit on my card was not holding me back, I think I could play on higher settings with nice fps still.

Do most of you have 2GB+ cards ? 1GB not enough it seems
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-08-2012, 03:44 PM
JG5_emil's Avatar
JG5_emil JG5_emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 331
Default

No generally 1 Gig Vram isn't enough but it really depends on your resolution. Most people are advocating 1.5-2 Gig VRAM. I have 3 Gig and play in 2560x1440
__________________

Intel Core i5-2500K @ 4.20GHz
Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Z68
Kingston HyperX Genesis Grey 2x4GB DDR3 PC3-1280
Intel 510 ElmCrest SSD 120GB
GeForce GTX 580 3072MB
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit
Corsair HX1050 PSU
Corsair Hydro H80 CPU Cooler
Silverstone Fortress 2
Hazro HZ27WA 27" 2560x1440
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-08-2012, 03:56 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

I have 3GB VRAM and the game uses them all, I've never had fps issues.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.