Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2012, 09:13 AM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

The canopy flew away like it was on rockets and did you see the pilot dolphin dive out of the plane using only his buttocks?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2012, 09:42 AM
Trumper Trumper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 461
Default

Watch the real thing here.It shows the canopy flying up and away clearer in the slowed down replay 1 min 20 onwards.
Watch it all to give you a sense of time involved.

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2012, 09:44 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Yeah but theres no doubt in DCS the canopy is modelled to blow away like it has explosive devices when in reality it slides back on its rails.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04-2012, 12:33 PM
ParaB ParaB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 205
Default

You guys are debating the modelling of how the canopy flies off the plane? In an early beta version? Seriously?



BTW flew the P-51 online for 3 1/2 hrs last night with my buddies and had a blast. Take-offs and landing, formation flying, ground attacks and dogfighting, good fun!

Really looking forward to more 3rd-party devs starting to create content for DCS world. If the quality is on par with what I've seen so far I'd happily pay 40 bucks for each new plane.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2012, 12:54 PM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaB View Post
You guys are debating the modelling of how the canopy flies off the plane? In an early beta version? Seriously?



BTW flew the P-51 online for 3 1/2 hrs last night with my buddies and had a blast. Take-offs and landing, formation flying, ground attacks and dogfighting, good fun!

Really looking forward to more 3rd-party devs starting to create content for DCS world. If the quality is on par with what I've seen so far I'd happily pay 40 bucks for each new plane.
At $40.00 a plane People will only buy the ones their attached too. Competitive people will only buy the best to rack up their scores.

If it was the $8.00- $15.00 that RoF charges then you'ld get people collecting them all.

Come to think of it if there were too many people willing to spend $40.00 how long would it take the ROF planes to start increasing in price?????

Downloadable content! You've gota love it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2012, 12:56 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Get used to it beacuse it will be the only way soon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2012, 12:58 PM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
Get used to it beacuse it will be the only way soon
You are not wrong!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:35 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
Get used to it beacuse it will be the only way soon
Not only do I think your right..

But I hope your right!

For several reasons.. One selection, Two cash flow for devs to do more, And last but not least.. Charging ~$40/plane has a 'flitering' effect.. And by filter I mean it tends to exclude the kid-os which in turn tends to exclude the brain dead team killing plane ramming types!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:04 PM
Stublerone Stublerone is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 250
Default

Common guys, nobody ever critizised the FM of a blackshark or an A10 and compared it to real life behaviour, like we do here on cod. I doubt, that even it all has a "military simulator" in its history, that the ED engine has that powerful and up to date FM integrated.

Think about the requirements of the military to train people? They always say, that simulating flight aspects is always too difficult to simulate. They need it to train the brain of the pilots and to train the systems and what to do in different conditions. The FM is not as important for the military as the fully functional cockpit instruments. It is not a very detailed flight simulator, but is a highly detailed systems simulator.
I doubt, that the FM is taken as serious as it is taken for CloD. CloD with its old rudimentary systems cannot compete by nature with such a grade of clickable procedures. The main topic in ww2 aircraft is to manage flight technical things by ear, eyes, and the few gauges in a cockpit. You need much more flight dynamic accuracy, than u need in a fully autopilot computer controlled aircraft with a bunch of helping mechanisms.

So in my view, dcs will never reach comparable flight dynamics to CloD. But this is also not the intention of such a sim. It has other things to care of.

So i doubt, that the flight feeling of p51 will reach the p51 in clod, as soon as it is there. I have never flown a sim like the il2 series, where you have the same feeling of really having air under the wings.

It is matter of priorities, but I think the classics collection in dcs will not reach il2 series. They will have their enormous potential in newer aircraft with weapon systems to simulate.

Hope, they will get some life into the sims, because it always has a strange dead feeling, when u just flying around! Not to speak about the missions.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:40 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stublerone View Post
They need it to train the brain of the pilots and to train the systems and what to do in different conditions. The FM is not as important for the military as the fully functional cockpit instruments. It is not a very detailed flight simulator, but is a highly detailed systems simulator.
Agreed 100%!

Most military flight simulators don't bother traning ACM.. It is all about the systems.. So there is a chance that the DCS FM may be lacking in realism.. Too soon to tell but I hope we are wrong..

If this P51 goes well for DCS.. Who knows.. They may shift thier focus a little? I hope so because their game engine is top notch!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.