i discovered the reason why everybody turns left after playing rof

[brando]

I use the joystick with my left hand and I generally break right - simples!

[raaaid]

going slightly ot outlaw if you dont like my wild claims like i have read people minds online sometime i wont do it again

that was the reason to post with my picture as avatar, take the consecuences of what i say and be responsible with what i say

knowing someone who knows me may read my posts will make me behave just as real life

so ill bite my tongue more dont worry

anyway this can only be good, though im not, i appear as so insane as to not being taken seriously due to my past honesty

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

you take my words literaly, i studied feminist literautre not so much the language

In the past you have mentioned your degree when noting your mastery of the English language. Your new statement above explains a LOT.

Originally Posted by raaaid

for example i said 10000 g not infinite

I'm pretty sure you said infinite but, maybe not, so I'll acquiesce.

Regardless, it does not matter what number you actually stated. It is wrong because you denied that the astronaut would feel the actual g-forces.

Originally Posted by raaaid

and i said i "USUALLY" win turning left and lose turning right

Actually, you said this...

myself of course i tried both senses and i know perfectly the reason i turn left instead or right:

turning left= win
turning right = lose

Nowhere did you say, "USUALLY". In fact, aside from the above, you have not used the word usually at all in this thread. Furthermore, aside from the above, I am the only one that has used the word usually in this entire thread.

Originally Posted by raaaid

i dont know why people tendency to turn left, i dont know, you dont know but we both guessed

I will reiterate, "THE TITLE OF THE THREAD STATES THAT YOU DO KNOW".

Do you wish to recant your statement?

--Outlaw.

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by Outlaw

In the past you have mentioned your degree when noting your mastery of the English language. Your new statement above explains a LOT.

"yet you called me a lier about my degree and when i post proof you didnt withdraw"



I'm pretty sure you said infinite but, maybe not, so I'll acquiesce.

Regardless, it does not matter what number you actually stated. It is wrong because you denied that the astronaut would feel the actual g-forces.

"it would feel zero g however the acelerations is, thats the thing about indiferent buoyancy"

Actually, you said this...

"if i say win its tacitly understand usually, you as contrarian rather undersatand tacitly always"

Nowhere did you say, "USUALLY". In fact, aside from the above, you have not used the word usually at all in this thread. Furthermore, aside from the above, I am the only one that has used the word usually in this entire thread.

"neither dis i say always as you said i said"

I will reiterate, "THE TITLE OF THE THREAD STATES THAT YOU DO KNOW".

Do you wish to recant your statement?

"i already did correct my first impresion by the left handed dna explanation so i might be worng in my 1st statemnet though a fokker dr1 turns much faster one sense than the other due to preccesion"

--Outlaw.

so youre work having fun arguing right

well i respect you since you dont insult me as others but next time you say a thing as my degrees being imaginary plz have the manhood to retract your offensive for me statement when gieven proofs

if it helps i see you as a friend after all these years

[Hood]

Originally Posted by raaaid

oh and i remember well how you hide away when i finally found the method to stand high g by being sink in a breathable fluid , of course i got it many times wrong before getting it right

I must have missed this one. I was reading about this 20 years ago. Hardly original, like most of your "discoveries".

In fact, I don't think any of your "discoveries" have been original thoughts. Funny that.

Hood

[raaaid]

maybe not original but independent yes

for example i disover this independenlty, that is without prior knowledge of it, and of course i went many times wrong before hitting the right idea:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_breathing

Space travel
Liquid immersion provides a way to reduce the physical stress of G forces. Forces applied to fluids are distributed as omnidirectional pressures. Because liquids cannot be practically compressed, they do not change density under high acceleration such as performed in aerial maneuvers or space travel. A person immersed in liquid of the same density as tissue has acceleration forces distributed around the body, rather than applied at a single point such as a seat or harness straps. This principle is used in a new type of G-suit called the Libelle G-suit, which allows aircraft pilots to remain conscious and functioning at more than 10 G acceleration by surrounding them with water in a rigid suit.
Acceleration protection by liquid immersion is limited by the differential density of body tissues and immersion fluid, limiting the utility of this method to about 15 to 20 G.[53] Extending acceleration protection beyond 20 G requires filling the lungs with fluid of density similar to water. An astronaut totally immersed in liquid, with liquid inside all body cavities, will feel little effect from extreme G forces because the forces on a liquid are distributed equally, and in all directions simultaneously. However effects will be felt because of density differences between different body tissues, so an upper acceleration limit still exists.
Liquid breathing for acceleration protection may never be practical because of the difficulty of finding a suitable breathing medium of similar density to water that is compatible with lung tissue. Perfluorocarbon fluids are twice as dense as water, hence unsuitable for this application.[2]

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

maybe not original but independent yes

for example i disover this independenlty, that is without prior knowledge of it, and of course i went many times wrong before hitting the right idea:

Liquid immersion and body cavity filling does nothing to eliminate g-forces. It simply allows an astronaut to withstand the g-forces more easily.

Your previous claim was that an occupant of your craft would not experience any g-forces at all.

Regardless, I reject fluid immersion as anything more than a curious concept b/c it can't be used in the real world. Who in their right mind would submit to having all of their orifices and other empty spaces in their bodies pumped full of fluid?

--Outlaw.

[bongodriver]

I knew a girl like that.....