Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:28 AM
MD_Titus MD_Titus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 493
Default

so, no beta patch is released, toys are thrown from pram and some "little miracle" decides to trawl old patch release threads, bumps them and bitch and whine and moan about not getting a beta patch released right now?

ip ban, surely? there's (arguably justified/arguably false sense of entitlement) griping and then there's being a worthless trolling scumbag.
__________________
specs -
OS - Win7 64 bit
CPU - Intel Core2duo x6800 OC@3.2ghz
MOBO - MB-EVGA122CKNF68BR
RAM - ddr2 6gb @800mhz
GPU - nVidia geforce GTX 280 1gb
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:36 AM
paf paf is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Sorry, I have to laugh so hard! All the people shouting for a ban, you can't read?
He just commented on an old Thread and get banned?
What a Kindergarten....


Btw., look what beautiful buildings and vehicles he made for CloD...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:48 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paf View Post
Sorry, I have to laugh so hard! All the people shouting for a ban, you can't read?
He just commented on an old Thread and get banned?
What a Kindergarten....


Btw., look what beautiful buildings and vehicles he made for CloD...

So what......it's like building an orphanage and then burning it down.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:04 AM
paf paf is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Default

Don't you think, you are (and all the ban-screamers) taking this all abit too serious? It seems this is almost religion to some people here on the boards.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:09 AM
pstyle pstyle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paf View Post
Don't you think, you are (and all the ban-screamers) taking this all abit too serious? It seems this is almost religion to some people here on the boards.
the OP?
No.

Aren't you being a bit OTT with your reply?

To all
If you don't need appreciate or need the headline here then move on.
No need to be a five year old and leave rather pathetic comments. The thread is just here to quickly highlight the pitfall of not properly reading the other thread, and getting caught out, which a number of people seemed to have done.

How about we think a little bit more about looking after each other's interests, rather than just bagging people who might not have paid as much attention to the other thread as you did? Hmmm?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:22 AM
banned banned is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 273
Question Why not lock all Beta and Patch threads from the beginning?

Why can't one of the Mod's lock the old Beta or Patch threads? This will stop someone from resurrecting an old Beta or Patch thread. I was caught out when someone else did the same thing about a week ago. Had a bit of a chuckle to myself but I do appreciate the other side as well. There are some very junior people on this forum that may not take notice of the date etc.
I believe someone has suggested in the past that when a Beta or Patch thread comes out it is immediately locked. At the end of the day, when a Beta or Patch thread comes out there is the myriad of thank you's for the first umpteen pages, then dozens of pages of arguments between members.
I just don't understand why we need to keep those threads open.
We now have something set up to report bugs, which should be enough to put in any whinges that people may have, including me.
Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:24 AM
mazex's Avatar
mazex mazex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,342
Default

But, like I said in another thread a bit off topic:

I do agree that it's childish, but at least Foo'bar bumped "his one" with:

"Unbelievable, all this is already 1 year ago. Feels like last month."

Which I must admit was a bit funny at least - and not pure evilness like pencons comment that was just done to confuse people into downloading it. The effect of bumping the old threads is however the same but as Foo'bar selected a date that is yet to come (4:th of may 2012 is not yet here in Sweden at least) even though there was the patch thread from the 27:th of april for him to "choose from" then as pencon had not bumped it yesterday... So - I think he did that deliberately to not fool anyone into downloading it?

EDIT:

And looking at the fact that Foo'bar has actually contributed to the actual CloD game with his marvelous trains gives him some "slack" for me at least (even though it was stupid!):

His stuff:

http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/

/Mazex
__________________
i7 2600k @ 4.5 | GTX580 1.5GB (latest drivers) | P8Z77-V Pro MB | 8GB DDR3 1600 Mhz | SSD (OS) + Raptor 150 (Games) + 1TB WD (Extra) | X-Fi Fatality Pro (PCI) | Windows 7 x64 | TrackIR 4 | G940 Hotas
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.