Why still no dive acceleration difference?

[JtD]

From the top of my head, 30 degrees.

[mayshine]

Originally Posted by JtD

From the top of my head, 30 degrees.

in game test we clearly found that the almost verticle diving will cost only

12 seconds from 300km to 700km

what will take "30 seconds to gain 100 yard"

what kind of steep dive will take 30 seconds???

[mayshine]

D team member and Non jokers

the pic below will talk

[AndyJWest]

the pic below will talk

Not withut (a) telling us where the initial document is from, and (b) telling us what it is supposed to represent.

And what the heck has the second image got to do with dive acceleration rates?

Either find some data from actual tests on real aircraft that proves the Technical Air Intelligence Center results are wrong, or drop the issue. So far, all we have had is speculation and waffle from you.

[mayshine]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

Not withut (a) telling us where the initial document is from, and (b) telling us what it is supposed to represent.

And what the heck has the second image got to do with dive acceleration rates?

Either find some data from actual tests on real aircraft that proves the Technical Air Intelligence Center results are wrong, or drop the issue. So far, all we have had is speculation and waffle from you.

The second image is showing the details of the planes only, the first is showing the diving diffrerence, and obviously it is not dive speed limit

you want to improve the Il2 or u want to win some dispute?

I have other souce showing the difference,

you can apply the same question to all source i provide coz it is internet.

if you do want to win a dispute instead of reaserching ,

let me tell you

you WIN!!!


I propose these only because I LOVE IL2


Thats all

[csThor]

Originally Posted by zxwings

Diving vertically down? Or at what angle to the ground?

[Smart@ss comment] Maybe they measured the distance between the two impact craters. [/Smart@ss comment]

[jameson]

I've posted this before but for the OP and others who seem to have little idea: The soundtrack is great BTW.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NWaHlnI_LQ

[mayshine]

Badaim, Saqson

Teasing and joking doesnt help you to improve yourself

I am not here without proof or prepare

why can not you guys sit down and do the reaserch seriously

What u r laughing only shows your ignorance

I am disapointing with your "senior member" title

[mayshine]

u will have to calculate a lot of factors before you can laught at me

shape, zero floating resistance, engine power, weight, propeller type and condition, deformation for the plane at different speed...and so on

Who were laughting at this topic are really simple mind and ignorant

I am here to help to improve IL2, to provide simers the best expierience,
instead of seeing some jokers.

--------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D team member, and who do not want to be the joker

Please check this like for ME262 compare documentation

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...erman-jets.pdf


and do the test in the Il2 4.11

here is the test in IL2 4.11 for the diving

starting altitude 5000m, throttle 100, stating speed 300km/h,
testing scope : 300 to 700 km/h

the result is below

Bf109G6as： 12s

Me262：11.7s


Isnt it showing something ridiculous?

[mayshine]

D team member, and who do not want to be the joker

Please check this like for ME262 compare documentation

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...erman-jets.pdf


and do the test in the Il2 4.11

here is the test in IL2 4.11 for the diving

starting altitude 5000m, throttle 100, stating speed 300km/h,
testing scope : 300 to 700 km/h

the result is below

Bf109G6as： 12s

Me262：11.7s


Isnt it showing something ridiculous?