![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
109 E in patch would have much more close to reality and best results performance - which is good of course. But looking at British main fighters performacne i really see not good things. Hurricane MK1 is too slow even for + 6 1/2 lbs performacne: ![]() ![]() ![]() Spitfire MK1 also not quite correct even for +6 1/2 lbs performance. At lower alts too slow and have to high alt FTH. ![]() ![]() There is a enough info about Hurricane and SPitfire MK1 performance i really wonder why 1C cant do it like it should be ???? I know that it could be possible to make it better even in old IL2 engine???? Hey really You can do it better????? Devs there is really enough info to do it correct. Really. Im dissapointment for these Last edited by Kwiatek; 04-24-2012 at 06:34 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kwiatek, the charts you present are accurate, I'm sure, and are on public record. After today's admissions, I honestly do not believe accuracy is desired nor sought after in this game. It's a shame, but I believe that to be the reality.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calm down ... did anyone compare the above charts with B6 ones? I don't think so. And btw, not a word about the fact that today the Hurricane is grossly overmodeled and requires a serious correction?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
umm yes they did, thats the problem, and no one here is denying the hurri is over modelled at the moment.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Then those who did the comparison, could possibly put their data on a graph, as B6 did? I did some random checks of the Hurricane I curves and I found interesting things. BTW what's the source of the Kwiatek speed/alt charts for Hurricanes ? And why they tell different figures? Last edited by Insuber; 04-24-2012 at 07:35 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't understand something.
Weeks and weeks ago, everyone was saying that the only aircraft that had historically accurate performance was the Spitfire IIa and that the other aircraft needed to have their performance increased as well. Now, suddenly, because 1C has decided to reduce its performance, people are popping up saying that the Spitfire IIa was over modelled. And now that the Hurricane is being reduced, people are claiming that it has always been overmodelled as well. What new historical research and findings appeared between those posts and these posts that has altered everyones views?
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP No.401 Squadron Forum ![]() ![]() ![]() Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Meh.
See you on the outskirts of Moscow, comrades. ![]() At least the G.50 might be fun to fly after the patch.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=27311 As you see I "popped out" 6 months ago. Cheers! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I also found that the in-game Rotol Hurri performed almost identically to the data provided here; http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...ane/l2026.html |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I personally think that the speed advantage of the spit 1 at high alt is great! I am looking forward to taking on the 109s now in my spitty.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|