Thursday Update, April 19, 2012

Hayward said:

>>Nothing rhetorical about it. Tree has accused them of lying about problems with the update. <<

Your posts remind me of the creepy kid always trying to get someone in trouble in the classroom. Consistently.

>>I have no idea why they'd lie about it, but I'd definitely like to see Tree's evaluation of the code. <<

Oh you little saint you. Butter wouldn't melt. Rhetorical is exactly the right word.

Tree may go a little far at times, but at least his reaction stems from a palpable sense of shock over the realse, and what has happened since. It is an honest, emotive reaction, and good for that.

Infinitely better than your squealing yelps of 'teacher, did you see that...?' and cursive stubborn high-horse questioning.

Frustration is allowed, and sometimes to be vented. Smarmy snide cheap-shots are generally to be avoided.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Falstaff

Tree may go a little far at times, but at least his reaction stems from a palpable sense of shock over the realse, and what has happened since. It is an honest, emotive reaction, and good for that.

It's been a year since the release mess. Get over it.

[hc_wolf]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

It's been a year since the release mess. Get over it.

I think it is funny that Ataros did not translate the sentence in Russian that said "Since we were unable to procure Tree_UK's experience, dedication and non-whinging personality to assist us in fixing COD, that we regret we will have to use dedicated programmers and our own brilliant staff to do what Tree_UK could have done between scratching his butt and sniffing his finger. SOrry all for the short delay while we fix these small bugs that we would like fixed you all can enjoy the fruits of the 1C teams labour.".

Well that is what spat out in google translate...

Thanks BS, gives me more time to build online missions. Overall I think the positive response from most has bee great. Wish your team the best! "