Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover
Reload this Page Friday Update, April 13, 2012
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2012, 05:25 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Manu View Post
You only need to give to every flyable plane a random wearing value (hours?).

When you enter in the cockpit you are informed of the engine's limit... it's not a real problem.

That doesn't solve it at all. In fact, you can model that right now using scripting anyway. The player need not think a jot about managing his engine because if he screws it up he has a random chance anyway of getting a good one or screwed one, and if he's gets a screwed one he can just respawn anyway.
Unless the server mission can track an individual players treatment of an engine and store it for use in that mission or subsequent related missions then it won't work at all.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2012, 06:02 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default
Enough is enough. Tired of waiting, here it is

http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/174

Get voting
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2012, 07:09 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
Enough is enough. Tired of waiting, here it is

http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/174

Get voting
Done.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2012, 10:00 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper View Post
Done.

Well I just voted a negative to neutralize that vote...
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2012, 10:11 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall View Post
Well I just voted a negative to neutralize that vote...
Aaaaaaarrrrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2012, 06:02 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
That doesn't solve it at all. In fact, you can model that right now using scripting anyway. The player need not think a jot about managing his engine because if he screws it up he has a random chance anyway of getting a good one or screwed one, and if he's gets a screwed one he can just respawn anyway.
Unless the server mission can track an individual players treatment of an engine and store it for use in that mission or subsequent related missions then it won't work at all.
I initially had your same idea, BUT I realize that is too much for the current condition of the software (CloD). It could be really interesting for the next versions of the game...

Right now IMO my idea is simpler to build in this moment: it does not solve it at all... but something si better than nothing.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Last edited by 6S.Manu; 04-17-2012 at 06:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.