Cliffs of Dover, a Year Later

David Harward said:

>>How would you summarize what you have achieved in here? <<

Not much, but I have called you on your awful malicious manner, and that is good enough for me.

Anything else, such as pointing out Chivas' complete and utter works of fiction (i.e. pretending to know what is going on inside the dev house, and general Yoda-ness) is a bonus before the ban takes place.

And then you can prcatise nastiness against others not so adept at responding. But with me, you'll get nowhere.

Ben

[taildraggernut]

I see you never got the account deleted like you begged for Ben Scammel.......so who really came here just looking for a fight?

Actually taildragger, I did..check with the mods. I checked-in again on the off-chance that my IP cycle has ticked over, whcih it seems to have done. The only reason was to give back a taste to some posters what they have been dishing-out, which I dont like.

A ban is imminent (I hope) so you can carry on lionising such posters if you wish, and defend their right to attack people unopposed. I'm not pretending to be a white knight of righteousness, more just venting at some of the nastier idiots who seems to have this place in thrall.

Ben

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by Falstaff

Actually taildragger, I did..check with the mods. I checked-in again on the off-chance that my IP cycle has ticked over, whcih it seems to have done. The only reason was to give back a taste to some posters what they have been dishing-out, which I dont like.

A ban is imminent (I hope) so you can carry on lionising such posters if you wish, and defend their right to attack people unopposed. I'm not pretending to be a white knight of righteousness, more just venting at some of the nastier idiots who seems to have this place in thrall.

Ben

2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy

p.s. @Philiped you spelled sense incorrectly

[philip.ed]

Originally Posted by taildraggernut

p.s. @Philiped you spelled sense incorrectly

Done on purpose mate because that's how Chivas spelt it; hence the italics.

david Hayward said:

>>Do you expect anyone is ever going to call you out for your awful malicious manner? <<

No, because generally I do not have one. I am posting specifically because of your postsm, recently, and previously. And they deserve to be held up.

And your endless use of the interrogative (question) is dull as dishwater.

taildragger said:

>>2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy <<

No, they dont. But a little natural justice doesn't hurt occasionally, if it's kept in check, and if it's justified, as here.

Ben

[taildraggernut]

Originally Posted by Falstaff

taildragger said:

>>2 wrongs don't make a right dear boy <<

No, they dont. But a little natural justice doesn't hurt occasionally, if it's kept in check, and if it's justified, as here.

Ben

But I thought you said you weren't pretending to be a 'white knight', now you proclaim yourself a champion of natural justice.....

Taildragger...no, I think you're trying to be too clever and picking holes in an argument that isn't there. Ego? Like Hayward's?

No champion of natural justice or anything of the sort, nothing so grandiose.

Posters such as Hayward should get a little back of what they put out, it's as simple and silly as that.

Trying to impute anything more to it is wasted energy and isn't going to get the big argumentative response that perhaps you hope it will?

Ben

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Falstaff

david Hayward said:

>>Do you expect anyone is ever going to call you out for your awful malicious manner? <<

No, because generally I do not have one.

All evidence in here to the contrary, I suppose.