![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What side do you fly mostly? If you are not on comms you wont coordinate at all and that is not anyone's fault. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Each time I'm logging in on ATAG I'm also logging in on ATAG's TS server. I'm playing Blue side only.
I haven't seen in these last couple of weeks any kind of coordinated activity (which is more than 2-3 players acting together), not from Blues, and neither from Reds. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Did you take note of how many total flyer's at the time...I have seen similar, but I attributed it to just the generally low number of people, say 10 each side...I know that they are popular site, but greater numbers are probably after my bed time
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wonder how many people realize that 15mph difference from stated performance was generally accepted in production aircraft.
I remember reading a report where production P-38s were performing 25mph below their specified performance and over 1000m below their stated max altitude. This happened to be a bit below the army air force cut off and the aircraft went to naca for testing. As it turned out the ducting for the turbo chargers had gaps of a few millimeters. These gaps were enough to make the air turn a bit too turbulent for the turbo-superchargers to ingest properly, and robbed the aircraft of a fairly significant amount of power. This resulted in a max speed and alt quite a bit lower then specified. Now I'm not saying the FM of this game is completely borked or flawed... but to expect that the performance figures from test aircraft that were probably hand assembled and tested by the best pilots and flown in the best conditions possible... well the stated performance of such test shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to aircraft flying on the front lines. Small flaws in production, and the dings and dents that come with field operation can rob and aircraft of a surprising amount of top speed. And this isn't even getting into the issues of pressure, temps and the like. Which also have a very large impact on an aircraft. Just ask anyone who has flown a cessna on a winter day and a hot, humid summer day.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccY25Cb3im0 |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Any plane not meeting the tolerances was sent back for refurbishing. I believe the procedure became more lax in 1945, though. I also believe that the allies had something similar.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Bobika. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As it stands right now, flying even two Blue bombers together will cause someone's launcher to crash long before they make it to target. Once we get the patch you'll see human piloted Ju-88 and He-111 formations of 4 or more all the time. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|