Cliffs of Dover, a Year Later

[Insuber]

Chivas I agree. I'll have a glass of C. Regal in your honor ..

[OB1]

The reason why ROF was better and more finished at release is because 777 is its own developer and distributor.

[Robert]

Originally Posted by OB1

The reason why ROF was better and more finished at release is because 777 is its own developer and distributor.

neoQB was the original developer publisher. Jason didn't come aboard until a year or a year and a half into release. RoF was a jewel in the rough, and many folks had issues with it. I myself never experienced the issues that were common in the beginning. Still, as a whole, it was a better release than CoD's....... sadly.

That said it appears CoD will have further backing and that means a chance to right the ship. I'll support that.

[David Hayward]

Can anyone explain to me why I should care how CoD was financed?

[GraveyardJimmy]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Can anyone explain to me why I should care how CoD was financed?

It can have a bearing on who dictated the release date (eg. Epilepsy filter controversy). No-one is telling you personally, so ignore the posts if you are not interested, others are.

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by GraveyardJimmy

It can have a bearing on who dictated the release date (eg. Epilepsy filter controversy). No-one is telling you personally, so ignore the posts if you are not interested, others are.

Why should anyone care who dictated the release date? That ship sailed a long time ago.

[GraveyardJimmy]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Why should anyone care who dictated the release date? That ship sailed a long time ago.

That doesn't mean its irrelevant. As I said, if you aren't interested- ignore it. Some people are interested in the publishing and financing of who made the game they play. If you aren't thats fine.

[6S.Tamat]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Can anyone explain to me why I should care how CoD was financed?

Can anyone explain to me why I should care about that question?

>>Yes, I asked. So far, no answer. It seems like there should be a reason for an argument that goes on and on and on. But there appears to be none. <<

Big deal.

Do you also go up to complete strangers having a private argument of their own, and demand to know the answer (if there is one) and expect all eyes to instantly turn on you?

Inimitable.

Ben

[David Hayward]

Originally Posted by Falstaff

>>Yes, I asked. So far, no answer. It seems like there should be a reason for an argument that goes on and on and on. But there appears to be none. <<

Do you also go up to complete strangers having a private argument of their own, and demand to know the answer (if there is one) and expect all eyes to instantly turn on you?

This isn't a private argument. If you want it to be private, take it to PMs.