N680GTX has just made my il2cod "flyable"

[ZaltysZ]

Originally Posted by Winger

Agree to OP here. Put in an 680GTX in my rig too yesterday. 2560x1500 with everything to high and pretty smooth gameplay. Now if the patch makes whats its said to be doing CloD will be my next spare time filler and i can hopeyfully finally wave goodbye to the well done but "biased to hell an back FM- game" ROF.

Winger

Oh, just wait for La5s in sequels.

[zapatista]

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ

Oh, just wait for La5s in sequels.

the RoF are canned and scripted FM's, with their current game core it wont get any better then what it is now, and/or has been in the past

[ZaltysZ]

Originally Posted by zapatista

the RoF are canned and scripted FM's, with their current game core it wont get any better then what it is now, and/or has been in the past

This is so irrelevant. You have missed the word "biased" in post of Winger. If he thinks that RoF is biased towards Allies, then I wonder what he will think when La5s will be appearing in IL2 sequels.

[zapatista]

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ

This is so irrelevant. You have missed the word "biased" in post of Winger. If he thinks that RoF is biased towards Allies, then I wonder what he will think when La5s will be appearing in IL2 sequels.

can you try this once more, but this time in english ?

[jcenzano]

Originally Posted by zapatista

the RoF are canned and scripted FM's, with their current game core it wont get any better then what it is now, and/or has been in the past

OT:

And what do you expect? FM based on extensive flight tests?

There is so little info about how those aieplanes flew. Modern flight test data comes from the 50s or 60s. And I mean "modern". In WWII era the did have flight test but mainly based on the main parameters and never combined as it was done later when E-M diagrams were created.

In wwI era they were just trying to fix the biggest engine possible in a given airframe or an airframe around a given engine.

I think the 777 guys have done a hell of a job, taking into consideration the amount of factual information available.

[Winger]

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ

Oh, just wait for La5s in sequels.

Ill just fly them then Just like i started to fly allied porsches in ROF. No matter wich side. Its just stupid to favor one side over the other if i am a developer. Sadly seems to be common in Flightsims.

Winger

[carguy_]

Originally Posted by ZaltysZ

Oh, just wait for La5s in sequels.

Bf109G6 eats La5s for breakfast

[zapatista]

Originally Posted by highness

now, with the N680GTX and the same settings as above, i am having an average of 19-38 FPS! and i just couldn't believe how nearly smoothly it was running, the performance improvement was really really MAJOR here! it became nearly stutterless and, now definitely PLAYABLE/FLYABLE...

nice, good to see the major gfx card upgrade made such an improvement am just slightly concerned you are qualifying your statement with the "nearly smoothly" it was running and "nearly stutterless"

for a 500$ card with 2gb vram, i'd expect/hope it would run smooooooth and flawless in all circumstances (over city, with large plane formations and close formation flying, flying through hangars, and with dust/smoke)

we need that gfx patch !!

[ATAG_MajorBorris]

Hey highness, I noticed you had the model detail set to high, try original, its probably the last setting you want move down. You should notice the cockpits and planes are improved with little performance hit

Let us know if its better for you

[highness]

Originally Posted by MajorBoris

Hey highness, I noticed you had the model detail set to high, try original, its probably the last setting you want move down. You should notice the cockpits and planes are improved with little performance hit

Let us know if its better for you

thanks for the advice, will try

Originally Posted by hc_wolf

I have a avg 85 fps on my rig. never drops below 58.

If i put vsync on i get 60fps and never below 58.

I run same full settings. power is in the i7

damn! im gonna get the i7 i think