Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2012, 05:11 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NLS61 View Post
How much was destroyed du to enemy action?
Not 35,816 tons worth.
  #2  
Old 03-26-2012, 05:54 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Kurfurst still won't give up his propaganda campaign. After being banned is editing Wikipedia articles without asking and trying to sneak it under admins noses by IP address

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...s/86.101.5.223

Just how many pro-Germany WW2 100 octane aircraft loons are there in Budapest these days?
http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/86.101.5.223#Comments
  #3  
Old 03-26-2012, 08:28 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
Kurfurst still won't give up his propaganda campaign. After being banned is editing Wikipedia articles without asking and trying to sneak it under admins noses by IP address

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...s/86.101.5.223

Just how many pro-Germany WW2 100 octane aircraft loons are there in Budapest these days?
http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/86.101.5.223#Comments
It is his SOP

Not suprised at all.. Only suprising thing is how many people still bother with him
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #4  
Old 03-26-2012, 11:07 PM
Gabelschwanz Teufel's Avatar
Gabelschwanz Teufel Gabelschwanz Teufel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
Kurfurst still won't give up his propaganda campaign. After being banned is editing Wikipedia articles without asking and trying to sneak it under admins noses by IP address

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special...s/86.101.5.223

Just how many pro-Germany WW2 100 octane aircraft loons are there in Budapest these days?
http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/86.101.5.223#Comments
What in the world does he do, aside from rewriting/reinterpreting history?
  #5  
Old 03-27-2012, 05:23 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
35,816 tons
You think they only had a two to one reserve......on fuel??

  #6  
Old 03-27-2012, 05:46 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
You think they only had a two to one reserve......on fuel??

So when reading comprehension is lacking.
  #7  
Old 03-27-2012, 06:02 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
You think they only had a two to one reserve......on fuel??

You think that they wouldn't use any of it in wartime, but store it up?
  #8  
Old 03-28-2012, 01:46 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
You think they only had a two to one reserve......on fuel??

Actually the 35,816 tons of 100 Octane consumed was used to cook sausages and eggs and and toast lots of Crumppets.

(He used exactly the same arguments against the RAF using 100/150 grade fuel - Crumpp, who doesn't know the differences between fuel reserves, fuel issued and fuel consumed, likes to believe that the RAF specialised in storing fuel reserves of high grade aviation fuel like squirrels and never using the stuff, unlike the generous Germans who used high octane fuel like it was water.)

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 03-28-2012 at 01:56 AM.
  #9  
Old 03-28-2012, 03:44 AM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
Actually the 35,816 tons of 100 Octane consumed was used to cook sausages and eggs and and toast lots of Crumppets.

(He used exactly the same arguments against the RAF using 100/150 grade fuel - Crumpp, who doesn't know the differences between fuel reserves, fuel issued and fuel consumed, likes to believe that the RAF specialised in storing fuel reserves of high grade aviation fuel like squirrels and never using the stuff, unlike the generous Germans who used high octane fuel like it was water.)
LOL!

But be carful what you say 'here' because Kurfurst might use your quote at 'wiki' as source of proof as to why 100 octane was not aval for Spits and Hurris
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #10  
Old 03-28-2012, 05:52 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Crump wouldn't happen to fly blue by any chance would he?
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.