![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If he or Luthier feel they have anything to say about the sequel they could use a 'Sequel' thread. Perhaps that would avoid people creating a conflict between the two separate issues.
__________________
klem 56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds" http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/ ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
+1
As servers like Replka and ATAG can attest, many people are working around the issues with the current game and are having a great time using COD. Patches will come when they come, we can't hurry them up. I feel that it should be an an internal process of the development team to decide what is in the patches (and updates for that matter) and that it is their right as the artists that they are to do so. I want to see whats happening over the horizon and I feel that the future direction of the sim is very important to the community. I feel that the BOM updates show a long term commitment to the series by the developers. This is really important from my point of view. Thanks Black Six for your update and for the enthusiasm and effort that you and the development team are putting into the Il2 series. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm just tired. One year and we don't have a good graphic engine - major part of ANY good sim engine. I'm just waiting for the "beta" patch with some NOTICEABLE graphics development. I'm not happy. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Same here, the sim is awesome, but the ctd, airplane vanishing, AA, hurricanes outperforming 109's, has me very sad at the moment, hope the patch comes soon so we can get back to loving our sim again.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks B6 for the straightforward response. Your English is fine; much, much better than my Russian.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I share Insuber's thoughts (great post).
Blacksix, than you for the the explanation. I prefer this version over the other, and I am convinced that is the truth. S!
__________________
Last edited by SG1_Lud; 03-17-2012 at 08:11 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for your effort!
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 03-17-2012 at 08:27 PM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good to know, thx again & Greetz from Berlin
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|