Blacksix please...

[Force10]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

furbs.. I have a few questions for you.. Could you take 5 mins to answer them? Thanks in advance

1) Looking at your list of questions, do you belive there are any that Luthier is NOT aware of?
2) Do you believe Luither lying when he says "We’re working on it non-stop" wrt the patch?
3) Do you belive all your questions could be answered in 5 min or less to the level of detail that would satisfy you and others? (ie beyond a simple Y or N)

If you answered no to all three questions..

Than wouldn't you agree that Luither's time would be better spent working on the patch than giving us highly detailed dally updates that due to the very nature of programing could be undone or changed the next day due to an previously unforeseen programing issue?

If you answered yes to any of the three questions disregard the need to reply back

S!

If you read his post you would see he is asking if these "known" issues are going to be addressed in this patch, or if we will have to wait longer. Maybe you can just put your personal issues aside, because it is something most of us want to know, pessimists and optimists alike.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by Force10

If you read his post you would see he is asking if these "known" issues are going to be addressed in this patch, or if we will have to wait longer.

Read it.. And I have read it each and everytime furbs or anyone else asks it..

Just wanted to get a feel as for what people like furbs expect..

In that I fear the exptations are allreayd set so high that no amount of fixes or additions will make everyone happy..

But I digresss..

It appear that BS has allready stated what I was trying to say, i.e.

Originally Posted by BlackSix

All we can tell about the patch is in today's update.
We do not announce anything yet about the details. To talk and not do - it's the worst thing in our situation. Expect the Readme, please, everything will be written.

In a nut shell..

Why have Luither write up the pending 'readme' prior to the work being done?

Nuff said on this imho

Your milage may vary

[Damixu]

What I see here in the forum in general is different people asking the same (valid or not) questions again and again, even some of them are already answered.

May I propose that you Black Six collect and condense these same (20ish or so) key questions to one solid highly visible sticky thread and cleary communicate with mods that no already stated question are allowed to be posted.

At least I suffer a lot glansing these forums reading same (and often whiney) questions again and again. The more relevant content are clouded by this unneccesary repetition.

Just my two cents...

[Force10]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

In that I fear the exptations are allreayd set so high that no amount of fixes or additions will make everyone happy..

Well, the response was bad news for offline flyers like myself since the game runs pretty smooth already, so it was good to know. The patch won't do much for the offline experience, so on the shelf it will stay....again. It's funny how far we have to lower the bar when "expectations are set so high" to be able to have a enjoyable offline experience a year after purchase.

[zapatista]

Originally Posted by Force10

Well, the response was bad news for offline flyers like myself since the game runs pretty smooth already, so it was good to know. The patch won't do much for the offline experience, so on the shelf it will stay....again. It's funny how far we have to lower the bar when "expectations are set so high" to be able to have a enjoyable offline experience a year after purchase.

force10,

what are your main offline issues ? (other then some specific problems in several plane models flight behaviour and bugs in their controls, which the on-liners also experience)

it be helpfull if you can provide some specific information of what your priority fixes for off-line would be.