Fresh stuff from sukhoi.ru (Discussion)

[David198502]

ok thx anyway BS for your dedication on this forum and your customers.
i really hope that the reasons you are talking about, are nothing too serious or major, though it sounds that way

[jimbop]

Hi BlackSix - did I read correctly that the readme is written but not authorized for publication? Perhaps you could ask Luthier on our behalf for a Friday preview!

[Blackdog_kt]

Originally Posted by jimbop

Hi BlackSix - did I read correctly that the readme is written but not authorized for publication? Perhaps you could ask Luthier on our behalf for a Friday preview!

That would be a very good idea, but only if they publish the parts of the readme they are 100% sure will make it into the patch.

I really want to see some specific details about what is getting fixed, but if something is included in the readme and then it doesn't make the patch, we'll have to deal with a lynch mob situation here

So, like jimbop says, if it's possible ask Luthier to give us part of the readme for the fixes that you are 100% sure will go into the patch.

That doesn't have to be complicated things that can break when something changes (like an entire graphics or sound engine).

A lot of people would be happy to know about specific, isolated aircraft systems, which are (i suppose) not so dependent on other parts of the code and thus, easier to be sure if they are done or not.

For example "the bombsights have been corrected", or "the ju88 gyrocompass works and the He111P's compasses no longer display reversed headings".

If you can do this BlackSix it would be very appreciated by many in the community. Thanks for the information

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt

That would be a very good idea, but only if they publish the parts of the readme they are 100% sure will make it into the patch.

I really want to see some specific details about what is getting fixed, but if something is included in the readme and then it doesn't make the patch, we'll have to deal with a lynch mob situation here

So, like jimbop says, if it's possible ask Luthier to give us part of the readme for the fixes that you are 100% sure will go into the patch.

That doesn't have to be complicated things that can break when something changes (like an entire graphics or sound engine).

A lot of people would be happy to know about specific, isolated aircraft systems, which are (i suppose) not so dependent on other parts of the code and thus, easier to be sure if they are done or not.

For example "the bombsights have been corrected", or "the ju88 gyrocompass works and the He111P's compasses no longer display reversed headings".

If you can do this BlackSix it would be very appreciated by many in the community. Thanks for the information

Agreed, I demand appeasement

[pupo162]

news on sli crossfire? please?

[satchenko]

What can we wait for tomorrow? screenshots? videos? info of the new engine?
Please Blacksix, Do not dissapoint the people who bought this product several months ago, like me.
Expectations are high. If there is no patch tomorrow at last give us good information, benchmarks, something.

Thank you B6.

I dont write in this forum never, my english is very poor, i will thank you if you can answer me this time

[Robert]

A video of the new Black Death track featuring the new graphics engine would be nice. I wouldn't mind seeing it in the current graphics version, either.

[BlackSix]

Originally Posted by satchenko

What can we wait for tomorrow? screenshots? videos? info of the new engine?
Please Blacksix, Do not dissapoint the people who bought this product several months ago, like me.
Expectations are high. If there is no patch tomorrow at last give us good information, benchmarks, something.

Thank you B6.

Tomorrow will be screenshots of the IL-2 and may be the cockpit of IL-2.

[bw_wolverine]

Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt

That would be a very good idea, but only if they publish the parts of the readme they are 100% sure will make it into the patch.

I really want to see some specific details about what is getting fixed, but if something is included in the readme and then it doesn't make the patch, we'll have to deal with a lynch mob situation here

So, like jimbop says, if it's possible ask Luthier to give us part of the readme for the fixes that you are 100% sure will go into the patch.

That doesn't have to be complicated things that can break when something changes (like an entire graphics or sound engine).

A lot of people would be happy to know about specific, isolated aircraft systems, which are (i suppose) not so dependent on other parts of the code and thus, easier to be sure if they are done or not.

For example "the bombsights have been corrected", or "the ju88 gyrocompass works and the He111P's compasses no longer display reversed headings".

If you can do this BlackSix it would be very appreciated by many in the community. Thanks for the information

While I pine like the rest of us for a look at the fixes, there's no 100% assurance that something will be in a beta patch until the patch is available to download, so I don't think it's a good idea to release any info like this until the patch is done.

Please let it be soon! I'm sure Luthier and the team are desperate to give us good news when they can since we're all such a sour bunch to start

[albx]

great... so no news about the ghost-patch and more screenshots of tanks? No video of the beta patch and nothing at all.... to be honest I don't care about the sequel if the game I bought will not be fixed first...

thank you