![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ground vehicles are fine with me, except I don't know how we apply them in the Battle of Britain.
Where were there ground battles? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
They are probably intended for the BoM. But when the sequel comes out we can use them to create "what if" scenarios in CloD. Lots of people like that kind of thing.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
True That!
Take IL-2 46 for example.. Lot's of what if content there
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
@Chivas, no....not everyone thinks that all work is stopped on the flight sim aspects at all mate, as Feathered pointed out, and I agree with him. @Bliss and Ace, chaps please leave it out with the petty name calling, there's no need for it and its school yard stuff really. That's what I was referring to earlier, and it happens like clock work. It probably intimidates some too (not I....lol, just don't see the point in tit for tat really) and stops them posting what they really think because they'll think its not worth the hassle. Disappointing, really. We are all on the same side as regards the flight sim aspect, we are all fans and want the franchise to do well. Just different views. Easiest thing in the world to throw insults about when others hold a view different to your own. Its pretty weak to be honest. Thats all, I'll tune in next week and look forward to the patch. Cheers. Last edited by RCAF_FB_Orville; 02-24-2012 at 11:12 PM. Reason: * |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
B6 : May I say that the whistle on the train sounds very American.
British train whistles tend to be a single tone and higher. None of this vulgar, colonial multitone showiness 56RAF_phoenix |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
On the other hand, most often only one opinion is allowed here.
__________________
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Player controllable tanks - will this mean we will get a "Panzer-Mädchen" campaign, please?
You save a cute blonde girl in your 38(t) Praga from the evil claws of the eengleesh cruiser tank hordes. The possibilities are endless ...
__________________
Two weeks. Be sure. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Imo, of course.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I liked what I saw. Maybe the tank boys will will rolling along the ground the the fly boys will be fighting over head.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That's very true Orville but I strongly believe that the ranks of the Royal Navy will be filled quite quickly once the SDK is released. I know it isn't ideal having to rely on community work to fill the gaps but in reality, there is a shed load of work required to model these ships in all their detail and the devs could never devote precious resources to that - imagine the outcry then.....I bought a flight sim and you give me the Atlantic Fleet! In a way this would be better as in the long run it is the only way we're going to see some significant ships modeled due to the rights issues over in the US. Probably not a Royal Navy issue but an issue non the less. I really do think this thing will start snowballing once the stability and FPS issues are sorted out and the SDK released. The future looks very bright in my eyes. Let's see where the patch takes us. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|