Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2012, 04:05 PM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
The graphical issues were seperate to the fps issue, they did not always cause such a significant drop. Fact. Even my old E6600 and 8800GTS was capable of running with clouds early on. A great many people does not equal all. Jog on mate
lol....Think you need to 'jog along' mate.....Back to Narnia and La-la land if you think the clouds never caused big performance issues previously....despite all evidence to the contrary (no offence) I already stated the particle thing just made matters worse, you must have missed it.

Nevermind though, thats enough 'the clouds were always fine' revisionism and untruth for one day, tis the past and I'm sure we all look forward to the imminent improvements.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2012, 04:26 PM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
Riiiight, so you admit I am right and that a prior patch caused significant issues with the clouds and yet you are still arguing with me...

Clouds before hand had about the same performance impact as they do in IL2 1946, oddly enough because it takes some power to render them, or do you expect them to be CPU/GPU time free? Cooupled with a failing engine already it just made matters worse.

Not sure what evidence you've provided other than to make some claims that do not in any way tally with my experience and oh wait, yours too given you just admitted that a prior patch caused a major issue with them.
*Sigh* Since you are apparently not even bothering to read what I am actually writing or paying attention......

Heres a reminder though

"Dano mate, its not really a 'bug that was introduced a few patches ago' at all. The clouds have been crap and caused performance issues from day one (March last year when I bought the C.E. edition). The crapness was just somewhat 'amplified' by what seems to be the particle issues in the later patchs which also causes massive slowdowns with smoke for most people, but its always been a concern.

'Oh wait', I'm not agreeing with you at all or 'admitting' anything .....I'm saying its always been an issue pre particle fiasco, the patch just made matters worse.

I'm happy for you that clouds have always been 'fine' your end, thats great Dano. I have great rig and its never been 'fine', so I somewhat doubt your assertion. The 'evidence' is all there in numerous bug threads on this forum, and many others. Like I say though, nevermind.....and I'm glad you are happy with mediocrity.

Roll on patch!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-23-2012, 04:47 PM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
I'm the one not reading?
Err, Yes, I read that. What of it? Apart from it not being true, lol. Neither is 'they were fine'.

Y'know what.....it doesn't matter man. You think they were 'fine' previously, and that one of the previous patches was the cause, I don't. It just made it worse. I'm a bit bemused how a GTX580 couldn't do the job as well as your 8800 at the time, and make the performance 'fine', but its a crazy world we live in Dano. Thats Ok and we can agree to disagree I suppose.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2012, 04:53 PM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
Or you can carry on making stuff up...
If ye say so mate, lol....Out.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-23-2012, 04:55 PM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Orville, I apologise mate, I've just re-read everything and must admit I misread your first reply and as such I'm in the wrong here. Sorry.
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1

Last edited by Dano; 02-23-2012 at 05:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-23-2012, 05:11 PM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
Orville, I apologise mate, I've just re-read everything and must admit I misread your first reply and as such I'm in the wrong here. Sorry.
Hey, no worries Dano mate its fine.....and I appreciate that, thanks kindly.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-23-2012, 05:20 PM
NLS61 NLS61 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 218
Default Report

So you put in the effort to make them, I think you should get reports on how they do on differnt setups.
Well i've tried them.
Normaly I'm getting around 55 > 60 fps.
the worst it gets with The first three is 38 FPS.
Everything up to to and including the full overcast is ok minum FPS there is 25 averaging 32.
The thundercloud brought my set to it knees averaging 8 FPS.
Thanks for making these availble.

Niels
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-23-2012, 06:30 PM
Jatta Raso Jatta Raso is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 411
Default

been trying this myself, the expected happened, performance coming down below 15FPS, 8-10FPS at worst, mostly 25-20FPS, sometimes above, but the uneven frame rate (and stutters) are the real issue, it oscillates so wildly at times the average frame rate means nothing.

that aside, some flickering clouds, their colour and lightning is too even causing some lack of depth perception (at least for my eye); clouds look good from a certain angle and not so great form another, but overall they will definitely add another dimension; this test revived the notion that something's been lacking. not that great aesthetically speaking, big performance hit, but great potential there.

noted that the engine drops power dearly through thick clouds, preventing from climb and sometimes even maintaining altitude, maybe too exaggerated? didn't try the carburetor heater though.

thanks for sharing the test!
____________________________________________
q6600 2.4 oc 3.4 / GTX 570 1280MB / 4GB DDR2 800
SATA 3 / P5K-E Wi-Fi
Thrustmaster Flight Stick X
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.