Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:12 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Hm...

I don't see anything in this issue of 100 octane fuel.
Do you know which fuel is now flying Spitfire and Hurrican in the game?
Uh, unless the dials are lying the game simulates 87 octane fuel for the RAF.

BTW BlackSix ... the screenshot of the russian village shows only wooden houses. I am a plastic modeller and I have seen numerous photos showing rural houses with chalk-white brickearth walls and a straw roof. I wonder if this was something common or limited to a certain geogeaphical area. No biggie, but simply obvious in its absence from said screens.
  #2  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:19 PM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
Uh, unless the dials are lying the game simulates 87 octane fuel for the RAF.

BTW BlackSix ... the screenshot of the russian village shows only wooden houses. I am a plastic modeller and I have seen numerous photos showing rural houses with chalk-white brickearth walls and a straw roof. I wonder if this was something common or limited to a certain geogeaphical area. No biggie, but simply obvious in its absence from said screens.
We have shown not all made ​​at home)
These houses are typical for the western and central parts of Russia.
What you say, is typical for the Ukraine and southern regions. If we do these maps - there will be other houses.
  #3  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:21 PM
jg27_mc jg27_mc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Porto Santo Island, Portugal
Posts: 249
Default

Thanks for the update!

Regards.
  #4  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:22 PM
phoenix1963's Avatar
phoenix1963 phoenix1963 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Hm...

I don't see anything in this issue of 100 octane fuel.
Do you know which fuel is now flying Spitfire and Hurrican in the game?
I think we've just had the broadest hint possible from B6.

The implication is that CloD is at 100 octane (but the engine models are porked) and the sequel BoM will have the option for 87 octane.

56RAF_phoenix

EDIT: which doesn't explain the Blenny problems... except another porked engine model

Last edited by phoenix1963; 02-10-2012 at 02:23 PM. Reason: additional thought
  #5  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:33 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Hm...

I don't see anything in this issue of 100 octane fuel.
Do you know which fuel is now flying Spitfire and Hurrican in the game?

B6, this specifically mentions an option within the menu to select. That does not mean you didn't include it, but from this reply it appears that you aren't including it? Even then I am unsure because your answer is ambiguous.

IF there is 100 octane fuel for the aircraft already then it is not modeled. Please could you answer which fits your explanation:

1. It is already there but not modeled in FM.
2. It is already there but not modeled in FM and we are going to model it in FM in the CloD patch.
3. We have no plans to model it in the CloD patch but it will be modeled in BoM
4. We have no plans to model it ever

Last edited by Osprey; 02-10-2012 at 02:35 PM.
  #6  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:45 PM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey View Post
B6, this specifically mentions an option within the menu to select. That does not mean you didn't include it, but from this reply it appears that you aren't including it? Even then I am unsure because your answer is ambiguous.

IF there is 100 octane fuel for the aircraft already then it is not modeled. Please could you answer which fits your explanation:

1. It is already there but not modeled in FM.
2. It is already there but not modeled in FM and we are going to model it in FM in the CloD patch.
3. We have no plans to model it in the CloD patch but it will be modeled in BoM
4. We have no plans to model it ever
I myself don't know anything on this subject, it does not overlap with my work. I need to ask permission for publication by Ilya such data, and then find out this information from the programmer.
  #7  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:55 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
I myself don't know anything on this subject, it does not overlap with my work. I need to ask permission for publication by Ilya such data, and then find out this information from the programmer.
If you could ask Luthier to read the bugs report thread then maybe these issues could get addressed sooner, so we dont keep springing bugs on you that you have no knowledge of.
  #8  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:44 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Hm...

I don't see anything in this issue of 100 octane fuel.
Do you know which fuel is now flying Spitfire and Hurrican in the game?
Hi. I made a small test a couple of months ago, the ingame speeds compare with original test results, vaules. This is what i got:

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...9&postcount=28

Every aircraft have a huge lack of prformance (except Spit IIa), the boost is useless - there is no noticeable speed increase, only a few % (except Spit IIa), the Spit I, Ia boost is only +6 lbs instead of +12 lbs (the 100 octane fuel need to +12 lbs boost), etc.

In the past year was a lot of forum topics, but Ilja said, that the new FM is WIP, so we wait for what will be...
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
  #9  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:47 PM
Talisman Talisman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 74
Default

BlackSix,

Thank you very much for your reply regarding 100 Octane fuel. The aircraft instruments appear not to show 100 Octane performance;100 Octane fuel is documented as one of the fundamental aspects of the Battle of Britain for the RAF.
May I refer you to the detailed post from "Klem", dated 11th Jan, on the forum thread for requested improvements:

01-11-2012, 08:45 AM
klem
Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,066

100 Octane fuel

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Type of improvement:
Add 100 octane fuel modelling for all Spitfires and Hurricanes.

Explanation of Proposals:
100 octane fuel was in use by all of the Fighter Commans stations by the time of the BoB. Geoffrey Lloyd, British Minister of Fuel and Power said; “I think that without 100 octane we should not have won the Battle of Britain. But we had 100 octane.”
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchi...0-%200044.html
http://www.nceastmgtf.com/modules/ev...rted%20Oil.pdf
http://www.lago-colony.com/STORIES_R...HISTORY_DJ.htm

A list of reports on another forum which I link to to save space (especially read "Appendix IV" for performance figures and the BATTLE OF BRITAIN section under "A. R. Ogston, excerpt from History of Aircraft Lubricants (Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, PA USA), p. 12." for confirmation that "March 1940 Fighter Command converted all its Spitfire and Hurricane Rolls-Royce Merlin powered fighters to 100 octane"):-
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/avi...tml#post542367
and another listing combat reports mentioning 100 octane or +12lbs boost all from as early as May 1940
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/avi...tml#post542707

Benefits:
Historical accuracy/Realism.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/
  #10  
Old 02-10-2012, 02:54 PM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talisman View Post
BlackSix,

Thank you very much for your reply regarding 100 Octane fuel. The aircraft instruments appear not to show 100 Octane performance;100 Octane fuel is documented as one of the fundamental aspects of the Battle of Britain for the RAF.
May I refer you to the detailed post from "Klem", dated 11th Jan, on the forum thread for requested improvements:

01-11-2012, 08:45 AM
klem
Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,066

100 Octane fuel

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Type of improvement:
Add 100 octane fuel modelling for all Spitfires and Hurricanes.

Explanation of Proposals:
100 octane fuel was in use by all of the Fighter Commans stations by the time of the BoB. Geoffrey Lloyd, British Minister of Fuel and Power said; “I think that without 100 octane we should not have won the Battle of Britain. But we had 100 octane.”
http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchi...0-%200044.html
http://www.nceastmgtf.com/modules/ev...rted%20Oil.pdf
http://www.lago-colony.com/STORIES_R...HISTORY_DJ.htm

A list of reports on another forum which I link to to save space (especially read "Appendix IV" for performance figures and the BATTLE OF BRITAIN section under "A. R. Ogston, excerpt from History of Aircraft Lubricants (Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. Warrendale, PA USA), p. 12." for confirmation that "March 1940 Fighter Command converted all its Spitfire and Hurricane Rolls-Royce Merlin powered fighters to 100 octane"):-
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/avi...tml#post542367
and another listing combat reports mentioning 100 octane or +12lbs boost all from as early as May 1940
http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/avi...tml#post542707

Benefits:
Historical accuracy/Realism.
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/

I agree this would be a welcome addition and if it was server controlled then we could all do with it what we wanted. No more arguments.

There is no doubt in my mind that the RAF was using it in their front line fighters in the BoB period. I've even seen reference to bombers and trainers using it too in this period. They had more than enough 100 octane stock piled at the time as official documents prove.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.