Friday Update, January 27, 2012

[RCAF_FB_Orville]

Thanks for the update.....but more so the lulz at this thread. All we are saying.....Is give peace a chance.

Flight sim forum discussions always remind me of this 'The Day Today' satirical sketch....where WAR is invoked out of an entirely peaceful accord.

[phoenix1963]

Originally Posted by BlackSix

It’s our pleasure to continue our weekly updates in 2012!
....
So we address each issue at its own speed. Some bugs can be fixed very quickly, and they are. We can update a cockpit lever animation or fix a type in a matter of minutes. On the other hand, locating a memory leak can take many long months of dedicated work by some extremely qualified programmers. All bugs are not created equal.
[/FONT][/B]

I sympathise. It once took me 6 months to find a stack overflow that was writing over data belonging to another processor.

Some of the people here simply don't understand.

Looking forward to the patch.

56RAF_phoenix

[Bricks]

Nothing new on the western front.

[ATAG_Dutch]

Originally Posted by Ataros

upgrade if absolutely necessary - 2.6GHz is no go btw

Originally Posted by pupo162

2500k 8 gb ddr3 16000hz and one 560Ti, in exchange i was given the right to de-virginize his hard drive with il-2 COD. tha pathetic performance who came form that pc. wich for me high budget, pretty much left very clear that the problem is not on my pc.

Just so you both know, my set-up runs the game fine with all settings very high offline. I have to lower the buildings detail for London. I previously had a 5770 which was also fine, but only on medium settings, and London was a no- fly zone.

For multiplayer I lower the settings to High all round and have no more problems than the chaps with top of the range gaming pc's, so you don't have to upgrade very far to have a very playable experience.

Back to topic - The I-16 looks fantastic, and brings back very pleasurable memories, so I've changed my mind and am now very much looking forward to the sequel.

Thanks for the update B6.

[nakedsquirrel]

Great update. Well put!

And I can't wait to die a horrible, flaming death in one of those I-16's

[pencon]

Just wondering if there'll be an MC200 to keep the Fiat G50 company some day .. ?

[tomandre81]

Not to sound like a bitch, but I couldnt care less for a sequel. Why dont you use all your teams to focus finishing cliffs of dover and making it into one of the best ww2 sims ever? Dynamic campaign, good A.I, no stuttering, more realistic colors and shadows, fixing the radio. Red Baron 3d has an amazing dynamic campaign, why cant that be recreated?

[Dano]

Originally Posted by tomandre81

Not to sound like a bitch, but I couldnt care less for a sequel. Why dont you use all your teams to focus finishing cliffs of dover and making it into one of the best ww2 sims ever? Dynamic campaign, good A.I, no stuttering, more realistic colors and shadows, fixing the radio. Red Baron 3d has an amazing dynamic campaign, why cant that be recreated?

Simply put, finances.

[Sutts]

Originally Posted by tomandre81

Not to sound like a bitch, but I couldnt care less for a sequel. Why dont you use all your teams to focus finishing cliffs of dover and making it into one of the best ww2 sims ever? Dynamic campaign, good A.I, no stuttering, more realistic colors and shadows, fixing the radio. Red Baron 3d has an amazing dynamic campaign, why cant that be recreated?

If you buy the sequel, all new features, improvements, objects, aircraft etc. will automatically appear in CloD. So....you will get the best ww2 sim ever but it'll be the combination of 2 products.

1c are also working on patches to improve CloD before the sequel arrives so all is good.

[manfromx]

Thanks for the update.

Even AAA titles don't have 1/2 the complexity outside of geometry rendering and visuals that goes into flight sims of this ambition.

I'll continue to support you as long as you support your products. I'd hate to see this genre die.