![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ugly or not, that is easily my best plane in RoF, and it doesn't matter how ugly it is from the outside, it's a nice view from the inside with the ground scattered with D.VII's
![]() A great way to make an ugly plane out of a beautiful one, as has already been shown here in some cases, is to stick radar in the nose, or to make it two seater. I could post many two-seaters here (Sea Fury, Spitfire and Hunter to name but a few) that are still quite pretty, but no where near as pretty as their single seater originals. Last edited by Kupsised; 01-27-2012 at 12:09 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very funny thread! And really puts my aircraft recon to shame because so many of these I'd never heard of! BUT, I do carry an ace card, Gents, I give you.....
......The Fairey Gannet
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sacrilege!!! that thing transcended ugly back into beautifull
__________________
Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
What plane is this? Looks like an old P-47 with an inline engine and P-40 tail?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Which had a Chrysler XI-2220-11 water-cooled inline 16-cylinder inverted vee engine The follow up being the XP-72 aka Super Thunderbolt ![]() Which had a air cooled PW R-4360 that had 28 cylinders ![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 01-29-2012 at 03:24 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I wonder how this flying toaster pass the wind tunnel test. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() Some engineers must be ashamed for design flying things not planes.. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Great read on that P47 website. It's my favorite airplane so that was pretty fun to see all the crazy late war variants.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|