Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:23 AM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

Well done! Thanks for the detailed information.

My question is whether aircrafts equipped with MW50 really overheated that fast in real life. According to the test it cannot even last more than 2 minutes in the game. The only radiator position that is useful for Luftwaffe pilots are full open. I can't think of any situation where other positions can be used.

And I can't persuade myself to believe those coarse Russian engines tend to has less overheat problem than German ones.

BTW, 109 K4 C3 appears to have a flawed auto radiator. You can notice the radiator flaps are not fully open even the engine has been overheated for a long time.
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?



Last edited by jermin; 01-26-2012 at 12:12 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:27 PM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

MW50 merely allowed higher boost pressures and the max time to run that higher boost was 10 minutes after which you needed a 5 minute break.

That restriction is totally separate from any other limitations on running the engine at takeoff/miltary power at low airspeed. If the engine had a separate restriction on for example time at takeoff power that still applied over and above the 10 minute WEP restriction.

Running MW50 did not magically give the engine the ability to disregard its normal restrictions its cooling properties were a side effect and minimal. People seem to think if MW50 was permitted for 10 minutes then the engine should last 10 minutes regardless of how you mistreat it. That is just silly.


Gratuitous MW50 operation instructions in German :

  #3  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:36 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTE_Galway View Post
MW50 merely allowed higher boost pressures and the max time to run that higher boost was 10 minutes after which you needed a 5 minute break.

That restriction is totally separate from any other limitations on running the engine at takeoff/miltary power at low airspeed. If the engine had a separate restriction on for example time at takeoff power that still applied over and above the 10 minute WEP restriction.

Running MW50 did not magically give the engine the ability to disregard its normal restrictions its cooling properties were a side effect and minimal. People seem to think if MW50 was permitted for 10 minutes then the engine should last 10 minutes regardless of how you mistreat it. That is just silly.


Gratuitous MW50 operation instructions in German :

Let me translate that first sentence, the most important of them all, for jermin.

"What is MW-50 operation?
MW-50 operation means: Temporary extraction of emergency power for the purpose of hoirzontal and climb speed increase, allowed by boost pressure increase to 1,7ata and simultaneous injection of MW-50."

So, as I told you before, it is not meant for the pilot to give him an edge in zoom climbing or general fighting, but to increase his speed to get out of trouble.
  #4  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:19 PM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorin View Post
Let me translate that first sentence, the most important of them all, for jermin.

"What is MW-50 operation?
MW-50 operation means: Temporary extraction of emergency power for the purpose of hoirzontal and climb speed increase, allowed by boost pressure increase to 1,7ata and simultaneous injection of MW-50."

So, as I told you before, it is not meant for the pilot to give him an edge in zoom climbing or general fighting, but to increase his speed to get out of trouble.
Where does it say it should be used to get out of trouble?

you never climb and accelerate during combat? What if your plane can not outrun the enemy aircraft on your 6 and it is more agile than yours? So will leave MW50 disabled and wait for enemy ripping your ass off?

Don't pretend to be a WW2 veteran, will you?
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?


  #5  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:28 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jermin View Post
Well done! Thanks for the detailed information.

My question is whether aircrafts equipped with MW50 really overheated that fast in real life. According to the test it cannot even last more than 2 minutes in the game. The only radiator position that is useful for Luftwaffe pilots are full open. I can't think of any situation where other positions can be used.

And I can't persuade myself to believe those coarse Russian engines tend to has less overheat problem than German ones.

BTW, 109 K4 C3 appears to have a flawed auto radiator. You can notice the radiator flaps are not fully open even the engine has been overheated for a long time.
1. It can not last two minutes stationary on the ground without any air flowing through the radiators to actually cool it. That is what this test established as he tries to mimic a plane at stall speed at the top of a zoom climb. If your plane is constantly in that state you are a rubbish pilot.

2. Other positions can be used during 90% of a regular pilots flight time. Prolonged combat against top brass planes and pilots are rather rare actually. Even on a dogfight server, if you know what you are doing.

3. Exactly because of their rather rough nature they are more rugged.
  #6  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:13 PM
jermin jermin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 238
Default

Quote:
1. It can not last two minutes stationary on the ground without any air flowing through the radiators to actually cool it. That is what this test established as he tries to mimic a plane at stall speed at the top of a zoom climb. If your plane is constantly in that state you are a rubbish pilot.
Where's the difference? The engine still can not last over 5 minutes even during level flight.

Quote:
2. Other positions can be used during 90% of a regular pilots flight time. Prolonged combat against top brass planes and pilots are rather rare actually. Even on a dogfight server, if you know what you are doing.
Have you tried it yourself? Fly some sorties in some hot servers on hyperlobby and see for yourself whether you will have a chance to fly using other radiator positions.

Quote:
3. Exactly because of their rather rough nature they are more rugged.
Sorry, but I can't see your logic here.
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves
regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place?


  #7  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:22 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

There is still the unanswered question if the Komandogerät allowed the TA engine to overrev in dive at 110%+Wep+autopp.
  #8  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:48 PM
EJGr.Ost_Caspar EJGr.Ost_Caspar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
There is still the unanswered question if the Komandogerät allowed the TA engine to overrev in dive at 110%+Wep+autopp.
The KG adjusted (beside other things) the revs by pitching the prop and so prevented from overrev.
__________________

----------------------------------------------
For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com

For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications:
IL-Modeling Bible
  #9  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:59 PM
JG27_PapaFly JG27_PapaFly is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 115
Default

I've edited my first post: it now includes some inflight overheat data at 260kph IAS.
  #10  
Old 01-26-2012, 02:18 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EJGr.Ost_Caspar View Post
The KG adjusted (beside other things) the revs by pitching the prop and so prevented from overrev.
Then the TA152 C is bugged, it overrevs in a dive ~2900rpm, independent from engine temp.

ntrk: http://www.mediafire.com/?9b4asyzzt25uyyz


The H1 seems to be ok.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.