Battle for Moscow

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by Sutts

Unfortunately that would mean less revenue to continue the development and a weaker 1c which is not in our long term interests really.

Sounds very simular to a Ponzi scheme

There is angoing assumption in all discussions that BoM will fix most, if not all, of CLoD's short-comings.

That could well not happen (leaving past experiences out of it for a moment).

Having worked in a software house, this is unlikely - especially in a complicated dev like this. As with most things, I'd expect compromises and areas that receive priority.

Ben/Falstaff

[GraveyardJimmy]

Its not exactly a new game, but an expansion. They have said continued support for CoD will remain- how else would they get anyone to buy BoM?

[JG52Uther]

And there goes another thread due to a few posters who think they are more important than anyone else here.

I have said it before, this is not a school playground. If you think you are going to ruin it for everyone else, you are wrong.

[FS~Phat]

I'm not quite so forgiving - after numerous Warnings and having to delete 60 or so posts in this thread alone, a few of you deserve a little holiday because you knowingly ignored forum rules; hijacked a thread and argued like children, with wild speculation and blatant lies to top it off - even after several warnings over many threads.
I'm now banning some of you to cool off for a couple days. So you can think about what you've done and come back and be constructive, not just argumentative and off topic.

Consider this a warning Ban. Next time any of you want to test the moderators you will get a much longer ban if you can't control yourselves. This forum is here for the enjoyment of everyone, and a handful of disruptive people WILL NOT be allowed to ruin it for everyone. I suggest all of you that chose to degrade this thread go and read the forum rules again and come back acting like an adult with some manners.

~S FS~Phat