![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's called the "big lie" Osprey.
Repeat the same misinformantion often enough, and loud enough, and it will eventually be accepted as truth. At least on gamer forums like this. On real historical aviation forums this kind of behavior usually results in being laughed off the forum, or an outright ban. Right Issy?
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Last edited by Kurfürst; 01-10-2012 at 07:51 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
As long as there's a 100 octane spit mk 1 and hurri in game, i'm happy, which even the most vociferous naysayers admit were there in some numbers.
As to whether they all were or whatever, the nay sayers won't change there mind, but it will be irrelevant, and they can argue till the cows come home for all i care. Mission builders can build as they see fit. As long as we get the 100 octane spit and hurri. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
My issue is not really about the game in this discussion- if the game developers want to even up the competition between red and blue by compromising elements that's their call. I'll still play it.
Want i dont want to see happen is people altering historical facts. As Captain Rum said in Blackadder when challenged about not having a crew a aboard his ship: Blackadder- 'I was under the impression that it was common maritime practice for a ship to have a crew' Rum:- 'Opinion is divided on the subject'. Edmund: 'Oh, really?' Rum: 'Yes. All the other captains say it is; I say it isn't' |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I like you see all the evidence thats been presented to show only one thing, but there are some here that won't change there mind for whatever reason. However, since even the most vocal naysayers admit that there was hurris and Spit mk1s using 100 octane fuel in some reasonable numbers, they need to be in the game period. As long as the devs get that, the rest is just immaterial to me, people believe strange things, after all some people still believe the earth is flat.... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is a lot of interesting data and facts regards the octane rating and I have enjoyed reading through them, But, the simple truth is that a Rotol Spit Mk1a, as modelled, is slower than a Rotol Hurricane and the 6Ilbs of Boost does sweet FA to boot! - That's about as 'Black and White' as it gets - there is no 'grey' area in that simple observation!
Even if not completely perfect, relative performance of all the fighters is the essential fix for me (for the time being anyway....except having 6Ibs of boost working is better than no Boost)!
__________________
MP ATAG_EvangelusE AMD A8 5600K Quad Core 3.6 Ghz - Win 7 64 - 8Gb Ram - GTX660ti 2Gb VRAM - FreeTrack - X52 - Asus 23' Monitor. Last edited by SEE; 01-11-2012 at 12:55 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
If we are still debating (I mean hearing each other arguments) I wld say that Spit FM need to be fixed... Then the matter of 100 or no 100 won't be such a question. [/SradfordUpAvon_Mode=OFF]
Last edited by TomcatViP; 01-11-2012 at 01:22 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|