![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: Server set loadouts! | |||
Leave it alone! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
79 | 52.67% |
Allow custom setups to be generated and enforced by the server mods |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
47 | 31.33% |
I don't care! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 16.00% |
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leave it alone. The impression I'm having that this would cross that nebulous border between realism and excessive control. You can no more tell players what tactics they use so I don't think you should tell them which belting they have to use. That topic is far too diverse to begin with and comes with a general lack of solid information. Were there "official" loadouts? If so who decided what went in there?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...9&postcount=11 And we are already bickering over the FM models of aircraft that are largely based on assumptions IMO.
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I simply believe it's a non-issue. No need to overload the engine with more options,especially one which wouldn't see much if any use at all.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Prediction: "Leave it alone" landslide.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Of course, if people have to choose between historical accuratesse and easier success, what do you think will win?
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it was left up to the pilot in the luftwaffe.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Judging by the current state of the sim, the developers can barely put together a working game.
What makes you think adding this option won't just introduce another broken, buggy feature that will crash our games or cause disconnects? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I remember very well the long painful threads of whining, on UBIzoo about the ammo belting for certain aircraft. No need to go through all that mess again. There's no magic bullet anyway. A mix of rounds works better in most cases. If you get a 109 behind shooting at you and hitting, it won't be much difference anyway what he shoots you with. The E1 with 4x7.92mm can kill a plane just as easy as the E4 with cannons. Who is then going to decide on what kind of loadouts people should use? Do you put this extra work on the host? What about ground attack sorties? Most aircraft used different belting for different purposes anyway. Be glad we have the otions available to us, so we don't have to cry to developers or hosts to make this changes.
__________________
---------------------------------------- Asus Sabertooth Z77 i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler. 8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600 Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD Seagate 750GB HDD CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45 Win7 64bit |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jaws
I have magic bullets and silver ones in my ammo belt. ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Good to see that I am not the only one who remembers what a long discussion that one was. My last post here, sorry for trolling. ~S~ |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|