Ammo Belts Loadout/Exploit Dicussion

[JG52Krupi]

Yes that is a problem, but you do run out of fuel when the fuel tank goes, when the fuel tank catches fire you do die quickly but when it explodes you don't even have a scratch!!! Lol

However I have never changed my spit ammo and have never had a blue aircraft catch fire!!!

[SEE]

The BF109 does ignite spectactularly but keeps on flying in MP.

Most Reds will tell you that the default ammo belt is not as good or effective as a custom one and most use a much lower convergence than default or that was historically correct/used.

I prefer to have the choice and no limits imposed as long as that ordinance was actually available.

[pupo162]

100% agree.

like in 1946 ( not sure about COD ), mission makers were able to select either if the palyer could choose is ammo loadout ( could he carry bombs? was he forced to take off with a bomb? etc ) and fuel ( sometimes you were forced to take off with 100% others with jsut 25%. ). So i believe mission makers should be able to have an option "user can select personalized weapon loadout?" or give the user the choice to select between a couple of pre maid ammo loadouts.

its a complete different setting taking off in a all Mineshells + High penetration MG 109's or a 100% high penetration + incendiary spitfire, thant the default loudout.

[JG52Krupi]

Since the ATAG switched missions I have started flying E1 and just before the E4 was released I forgot i had setup the E1 with a few incindery rounds and now spits and hurris catch fire quite easily... I will be adding it to E4

[jimbop]

I would like for servers to restrict ammo type or amount but would object to not being able to set my own convergence. I don't know if one could be done without the other.

[SEE]

The problem is that the default load outs would have to be historically correct and, from my various sources, there were a variety used. Interestingly, Tracer + AP + reg Ball + De-wilde isn't available in the standard belt options for RAF fighters depite being a stock loadout according to some the sources I have.

When exactly this loadout was actually introduced is not mentioned - I see another set of arguments as per the 100 octane fuel debate.


Maybe you should have this as a voting Poll Krupi?

[JG52Krupi]

Yeah will do one now .

Plus this should be on the front page.