Poll!! Regarding old style Coop GUI

[TheGrunch]

That might be true, but as I've said elsewhere, we didn't buy this game to learn C# in order to do something that we've been able to do officially and far more completely since 2001. I can see the utility of C# for really advanced triggers and awesome stuff like that, but that is cool stuff that we have no right to expect as basic functionality. A simple co-op GUI is just basic stuff that we all expected since before the game was released. I understand your point ACE, but this is a game, not an SDK or an open-source project. I spend enough time dealing with horrendous and buggy scripting at work, I don't want it to eat into my gaming experience as well.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by TheGrunch

That might be true, but as I've said elsewhere, we didn't buy this game to learn C# in order to do something that we've been able to do officially and far more completely since 2001. I can see the utility of C# for really advanced triggers and awesome stuff like that, but that is cool stuff that we have no right to expect as basic functionality. A simple co-op GUI is just basic stuff that we all expected since before the game was released.

I am all for a IL-2 like COOP GUI!

My point is if it was easy to do, as 1C was re-doing the FMB to include C# 1C would have done it

So, clearly it was not easy to do and 1C felt it was better to give us more options/controls

But it is nice to know that if someone wanted to do it, it can be done via a C# script

[TheGrunch]

Aren't those two assertions completely contradictory? "If it was easy to do they would have done it but it's okay because it can be done in the internal scripting language by a random unpaid non-professional volunteer."

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by TheGrunch

Aren't those two assertions completely contradictory? "If it was easy to do they would have done it but it's okay because it can be done in the internal scripting language by a random unpaid non-professional volunteer."

Not at all

By easy to do I mean include all of the old IL-2 FMB way of doing things into the new CoD FMB way of doing things

Where as Atrols noted the old IL-2 way consisted to TWO seperate types of missions DF or COOP

Where as Atrols noted the new CoD way consists of ONE type MISSIONS

While 1C was creating this new CoD way they found it either too hard to include a the old IL-2 COOP GUI/MENU/LIST

Or

1C realised it was not necessary to include a old IL-2 COOP GUI/MENU/LIST because they knew it could be done via the C# script methods

Where 1C made the mistake was giving the user too much credit for being intesested enough in COOPs to write the C# code to create the GUI\MENU\LIST

Well some users that is

[robtek]

Just to stay on the ground here, MG never intended to release the game in the state it is.

They had to release, and what is missing are the user friendly interfaces, as there wasn't time to develope them then, and now there are other pressing problems.

So the game can give us all the stuff requested here in the multiplayer mode as there won't be a coop-mode anymore.

As MG doesn't have the resources right now to produce this gui, we can either wait for MG to have the time or we can wait for a ingenious c# programmer to reverse engineer and write it.

Thats it.

[JG52Krupi]

Robtek no one said it should be done immediately we are all aware that they released an unfinished product due to reasons that we will probably never truly know but this is irrelevant to this thread we never said we want it tomorrow just that we want it, as long as they inform us that it will be done at some point I will happy.

[robtek]

It seems that if the next patch solves the big problems of the core engine there will be manpower available to get the lesser priority stuff done.

So lets wait for THE PATCH to the beginning of the end of all problems(game related).

[robtek]

The sequel IS this game!

[JG53Frankyboy]

at least if you buy the sequel and it will be mergeabel (highly possible IMO ) with CoD, one will get the engine and GUI improvements. If not, we have to see how they will support the CoD alone . And a BoM alone also , if it will work alone at all.

i cant imagine they want have the same like with PF , one X.XX and one X.XXm patch. perhaps if you will buy BoM, the CoD stuff will be included, so this sequel will be a restart of the series

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy

at least if you buy the sequel and it will be mergeabel (highly possible IMO ) with CoD, one will get the engine and GUI improvements. If not, we have to see how they will support the CoD alone . And a BoM alone also , if it will work alone at all.

From what I have read I did not get the impression that there would be two stand alone games.. CoD and the Sequal.. that will be able to interact with each other.. For example, be able to join an online game using either one of the two.. Or that the sequal would be an addon to CoD.

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy

i cant imagine they want have the same like with PF , one X.XX and one X.XXm patch.

Actully that is the impression I got.. based off what was said and the 1C IL-2 track record.. Where each sequal basically replaces the previous version.. That is to say you could still play CoD with other CoD players, must like some people still play IL-2 PF.. Just most made the move to the new version (aka sequal)

Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy

perhaps if you will buy BoM, the CoD stuff will be included, so this sequel will be a restart of the series

That is the impression I got, and I hope that is what they do! Seems most likly based on the 1C IL-2 track record