![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: Do you want the old style IL2 1946 COOP Interface implemented into CloD? | |||
Yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
140 | 79.55% |
No |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 5.68% |
Not Fussed |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
26 | 14.77% |
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So it was easier in IL-2, which is not to be confused with it can not be done in CoD, just that it was easier That is kind of what I was gathering from all the posts.. In that I have yet to see someone post an example of something that can not be done in CoD. That one I can answer easily! As a mater of fact I allready have several times, but Ill say it again CoD is more complex because it can do more (read has more options) It is that simple! And that is true of typically everything in life, the more options you have the more comlex it will be As I allready poined out, 'IF' 1C could have kept the old and new methods that provide more control/options that many of the mission makers were asking for.. I am sure 1C would have provided both the old and new! But clearly it was not posiable to do both Unless you are of the belif that 1C could and did do both, but pulled out the old methods prior to release just to piss people off.. Which I think even the harderst of hardcore doom'n'glooms would agre that is silly
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|