Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2011, 06:11 PM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
Regarding the Corrosive power of shells as Storm mentioned, that's a thing that I won't put frwd to devs for the next patch

Well at least that a good idea for the next gen non-lethal super weapon.

But Chemical and kinetics E are the ones you usely talks abt in such a discussion

Here is another one of highly improbable kill rate in a E4 offline. I can assure you that those plane (AI) were maneouvring
8 bullets hit in 20, let me say awsome accuracy.

then let me ask: where did they hit? if they hit the pilot, im not amazed, except by your accuracy.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2011, 08:25 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
8 bullets hit in 20, let me say awsome accuracy.

then let me ask: where did they hit? if they hit the pilot, im not amazed, except by your accuracy.
Thx

...

But I fear that this score hve nothing to do with me.

Hit rate is too optimistic with shells patterns likes cylinders with some sort of proximity fuse.

Unless I miss something I don't remember those 20mm being such.

Pls remember :
1st : I can't hve the same hit ratio in my E3 than in a E4.
2ndly ; the diff in kill rate is over 100%

@ CheeseHawk : ok but if one shell is enough for a kill it does not mean that with a single shell you will score a kill

Last edited by TomcatViP; 12-12-2011 at 08:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2011, 09:34 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Don't forget that the rounds for the MG-FF/M are much faster than the older rounds for the MG-FF, so maybe with the same convergence in the same situation you might miss with the slower rounds and just hit with the faster rounds.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2011, 12:10 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Don't forget that the rounds for the MG-FF/M are much faster than the older rounds for the MG-FF, so maybe with the same convergence in the same situation you might miss with the slower rounds and just hit with the faster rounds.
+1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2012, 10:01 AM
Varrattu's Avatar
Varrattu Varrattu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Don't forget that the rounds for the MG-FF/M are much faster than the older rounds for the MG-FF, so maybe with the same convergence in the same situation you might miss with the slower rounds and just hit with the faster rounds.
~ please have a look:

~S~
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz
2x4gb DDR3-1600
GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB
Logitech G35 Headset
Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42)
Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard
Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.