![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh one thing I forgot to mention..
Before this 50kph value becomes some sort of fact I think it is important to point out that the data is from a 109G and we are talking about the in game 109E! And I am pretty sure the radiators changes a lot between the E and G model. And don't forget what Hatch pointed out! That the data is from a non standard radiator test! What does that means? Well maybe it means a standard radiator only causes a 25kph (or less) difference, or maybe it means a standard radiator will cause a 75kph (or more) difference. We don't know. But I think we can all agree that radiators will have 'some' affect on speed, how much we really don't know. We can agree to disagree as to if someone can 'see' a speed difference of 50kph or less! But here is what we know to be true Some people do 'see' a speed difference and others do NOT 'see' a speed difference How do we decide who is right? I know how and it does not require a burger king campaign on picking between a werewolf or vampire!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
If I was a moderator on these boards I'd make a rule that any thread claiming facts about the flight model without presenting evidence gets locked.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
All in all is it too much to ask to provide a track file for review when making a 'claim'? Is that too much to ask? I get it that some here may not know how to log the data to a file.. But come on how hard is it to recored a track file?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Speaking of which: I'm trying to write a script to log positional data to a file. Do you know how to get something like this to execute, client-side?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...338#post342338 Im at work right now, if you dont find that 3D space stuff by frog let me know (PM) in that I have a script at home with some of that code in it
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Can't figure out how to execute the script when the ntrk runs though. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Let me guess.. your thinking of graphing the 3D data to make an ACM display of the track file! When I saw the script gives access to 3D data that was the 1st thing I thought of too! Problem is, and don't quote me, is I don't think the script works during playback of a track file? I think the script only works in real time, as in when you start the mission the script runs. If so that is one of the limitations of the scripts.. Where as in IL-2 we had DeviceLink that was active during track playback.. And Devicelink allowed you to send commands (set) where as far as I can tell the C# script method only allows you to recive (get) data This is one case where I hope I am wrong! But, I have been looking around (google) and I don't see where the C# scripts are active during a track playback
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 11-01-2011 at 07:45 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|