radiators have no influence on speed

[SYN_Repent]

wrong where??

point to me where im wrong??

dont put me down for a vote for david, i did some testing myself, and did see speed differences, but by that time you had come along and inserted hand typed Diarrhoea into the thread..........again

[Vengeanze]

AoA is amusing in a raaaid kinda way.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by SYN_Repent

wrong where??

point to me where im wrong??

Gladly!

Gee.. so many to pick from, but.. Lets go with this one from my last post

So, let me see if I understand you correctly..

Even though I said on page 8, i.e.

Are you saying that was not me who said that.. Or are you asking me to ignore the fact that I said that?

Now..

Lets see if your man enough to admit you were wrong! LOL!

Note in RED you said I was not able to admit I was wrong, now take note in GREEN where I did admit I was wrong

Not sure how you missed that the first time? My guess is you purposely missed it. But assuming that you truly missed it may I make a suggestion? Try doing what I do and break up what people say into smaller chucks and reply to those individually, than you wont miss something like that and force yourself to eat crow! Just a thought!

[Flanker35M]

S!

This thread delivers...

[GOA_Potenz]

Hey ACE the othe day i was driving my van on the motorway and i couldn't tell if i was a running at 50km/h or at 100km/h

Come on mate you are pulling in no sense argue, everybody can notice a 10/
km/h difference, you have a bloody withe mark on the speed gauge to read your speed and the resolution on todays computers are mostly 1680 x 1050 or 1920 x 1080 or even higher, so resolution isn't a problem to read the gauges, also you have a lovely label that tells you the speed, but there's no way that anybody miss a 50km/h gap so please stop this argument, your graphic show that 50km/h gap from closed to open.

regs Potz

[SYN_Repent]

he might have german gauges potenz, he cant read them very well.

[GOA_Potenz]

Originally Posted by SYN_Repent

he might have german gauges potenz, he cant read them very well.

actually german gauges are easy to read than the allies as the imperial mesures system add more lines to the gauge as german in metric system is more visual cleaner to read

[Flanker35M]

S!

OK, studied the graph. Texts are a bit hard to read but anyway. Rotating it clockwise makes it easier BTW

OK, rotate pic 90deg and you see what I mean. Left side (Y-axis) is speed in km/h and coolant temp in Celcius. Top curve is for DB605A(marked with a *), lower curve DB601E(marked with a triangle). Lowest curve is the temperature curve and for both engines pretty much the same. X-axis is the opening of the cooling flaps in millimeters, 0-400mm.

IT seems the flaps were open 50mm and 81mm respectively. The note says something like: Just for comparison for DB601. DB605 is not usable because of the non-standard cooler and the cruising altitude, absolute values, see VB 109 18 L42 (must be a technical report) The harder to read note says something like: Not credited. automatic values ​​in H=2050m

[SYN_Repent]

your saying i was wrong, about you saying you cant admit your wrong......show me where else i was wrong......

its a laugh, you spout a hundred lines to show how much more clever you are than people, how stupid they are, and how right you are, then when your caught out, and PROVED wrong.......you write one little line.

you really need to start and get right to the point (if there ever is one) in your posts, because the majority of your words are just worthless spam, you have added nothing to this thread except the graph you produced to prove david right (great move btw).



@ david, now lets get back to the original post, i did some testing in an E3, at 3000m with around 1.3ata and 2200 rpm, i was making about 420 kmh

with rads closed the speed went up to around 440kmh, that was rads fully closed for a short period of time.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by SYN_Repent

your saying i was wrong, about you saying you cant admit your wrong......show me where else i was wrong......

its a laugh, you spout a hundred lines to show how much more clever you are than people, how stupid they are, and how right you are, then when your caught out, and PROVED wrong.......you write one little line.

you really need to start and get right to the point (if there ever is one) in your posts, because the majority of your words are just worthless spam, you have added nothing to this thread except the graph you produced to prove david right (great move btw).



@ david, now lets get back to the original post, i did some testing in an E3, at 3000m with around 1.3ata and 2200 rpm, i was making about 420 kmh

with rads closed the speed went up to around 440kmh, that was rads fully closed for a short period of time.

I said it before and Ill say it again

How is it that I knew in advance that you would not be able to admit you were wrong?

easy, I know you and your type!

Thanks for proving me right about you not being able to admit you were wrong! Now we know who is man enough.. ie.. Not you!