![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
S!
Quote:
But it may be due to pilot error, or it maybe so small that it is beyond your ability to make note of it, hence the need to log the data. With that said I noticed you didn't list your real world data reference.. Is it safe to assume you have one? If so, how much difference in top speed are we talking about here? 10? 20? 30? 40? 50? If it is less than 50, now take a look at the resolution of the cockpit gauges.. That alone can be a source of a good +/-20mph error.. Just another good reason to log the data Quote:
Maybe.. maybe not.. No real proof has been provided as of yet IMHO
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 10-31-2011 at 04:01 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
S!
Well, Helmut Lipfert said the radiator flaps on his Bf109G slowed the plane down as much as 40-60km/h and used them sometimes to avoid passing a slower target. Anecdotal sure, but seems that the radiators would cause some extra drag thus less speed. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I am not saying open rads should not cause more drag, and thus less speed Far from! All I am saying is that without logging the data, the sim pilot alone can cause a 40-60kph diff in speed. Thus the 'thing' you are looking for is in the noise of the human error.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Dav,
I don't see the same here. Nearly closing fully the rads of my 109 is what give me the 500-kph. Did you close the oil rad as well and fly the ball centered ? This does impact the speed by raising the drag dramatically IMHO S! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i dont have rudder pedals yet, so therefore i have the rudder set on a hatswitch on my joystick, which is not really precise, because its devided into steps. but without changing anything during flight, except opening the water rads, the speed will not decrease.and i zoomed into the gauges to look if it makes a minor difference.but i just couldnt find any in speed. oh and ace i will not argue with you...you dont have to believe me...you can try it by yourself if you want to, and if you want you can call it pilot error,...i dont care. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Providing a track is usually the best way to observe bugs claimed by pilots.
Also "usually" some one will try to replicate your observations and confirm it. looks like this threads all about standing around puffing on pipes drinking tea and generally hmming and ahhhing. Bring forth a chart monkey please............... . |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Agreed! Log the data as you fly, you will be amazed at the errors you can make!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#8
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
First thing to note..
Tom does notice a difference David does NOT notice a difference So who should we belive? Answer, neither! Why? For all the reasons I have already stated, and the fact that some are seeing a difference and some are not only reinforces the need to log your data during flight Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And I am not agreeing with you or disagreeing with you. I am simply pointing out the FACT that the error your looking for may be in your nearest mirror Quote:
Oh, and I am still waiting on your 'data' as in how much are we talking about here? 10? 20? 30? 40? If you don't know in advance how big of a difference you are suppose to see, than how will you know it when you see it! And you should take pause here and consider the fact that Tom 'is' seeing a difference.. So with that said.. Are you calling Tom a liar?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
mh well i dont get the 109s to reach 500kph in level flight.except if i push the nose slightly down for some seconds and level out at 500kph.but i cannot maintain that speed.it will slowly decrease again to 450kph if i dont loose altitude.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
so actually the fact that an hurricane is without really a big problem attached to the tail of an emil is because the emil pilots are not good pilots.
Sure. I always knew that hopping on an hurricane i would have been a better pilot. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|