![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
As well it could be, that with Pf the limits were raised - without me knowing about it. However, you are right, current work should orientate on the given and I see no problem with higher polycount for big warships/battleships, as they rarly come in dozens. However... it must be reasonable! And if you think about it, its expectable, that the King George V is rather high poly, with all the masses of tiny anti-aircraft weapons on deck (the AA guns on the after deck alone are already ~1000 tris). Marat on the other side is 'naked' and can live with a third of the polycount. Quote:
The trick is, not to look for the maximum limit, but for the average values - these to orientate on. See here the numbers of a few of the bigger stock ships (only LoD00, NULL mesh deleted) - in order of polycount decreasing: King George V. - 15867 tris ![]() Illustrious - 11444 tris ![]() Tirpitz - 8020 tris (!) ![]() Kent - 5961 tris ![]() Niobe - 4080 tris ![]() Marat - 3845 tris ![]() Illmarinen - 3036 tris ![]() Note, how the rather small destroyer is higher on polycount than the battleship Marat. As I said, its depending on size and complexity, if its really reasonable.
__________________
---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|