|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
10-25-2011, 09:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Whatever you are discusing here:
I SCORED MY FIRST ONLINEKILL TODAY! Sat in a Hurricane, managed to shoot down 2 bf109 and 1 bf110! What a day! Those were unexperienced pilots i guess, and i have to admit that I crashed into the first bf109 after it emergency-landed, but i am proud  Strange enough i have smoother performance online, so I hope some of you guys will see me at 6 o´clock high once in a while...  Good night
__________________
AMD Penom ll 6x 1055T Processor 2.8 GHz // 8GB Ram // XFX Radeon HD 7870 Black Edition DD (2048 MB Memory DDR5, GPU 1055MHz) // Windows 7 Professional 64 Bit Version Saitek x52 // Saitek Throttle Quadrant // Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals // Track IR 5 
|
|
#2
10-25-2011, 10:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can't seem to work up as much enthusiasm for Il-2 1946 anymore, that's for sure, I've been playing RoF a lot instead ("HERESY!" I hear you cry). The day that 1C crowbar a campaign engine like that into CloD I will be a happy man indeed, especially since CloD's SP and MP missions are by design interchangeable if I recall. Dynamic online campaigns in a cutting-edge WWII sim? Yes please! That and concentrate a lot of effort on the FMs and I will definitely be a convert for all time.
Good work Continu0! I think I've only shot down my brother and my old man so far, hahaha.
|
|
#3
10-25-2011, 11:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hope the offline side improves a lot. While I'm not an offline player in the least, there are a large majority of players that are, and I want all of us to be satisfied with the sim. The more that like it, the more it will improve over time for all of us.
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
|
|
#4
10-25-2011, 11:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In fact I'm beginning to live up to my avatar. Bloody Christmas.
|
|
#5
10-25-2011, 11:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Well said!
__________________
|
|
#6
10-26-2011, 01:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I must be the worst pilot on CoD then cause I can't even beat the Hurri's driven by the AI
 They've obviously got no stomachs because I get sick just watching them dance around in front of me when they're trying to evade. lol
|
|
#7
10-25-2011, 11:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Congrats, Continu0! There's no kill like an online kill!
__________________
|
|
#8
10-26-2011, 07:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Winger PS: Congrats to your first kills. Even if it were virtual comrades of mine
|
|
#9
10-26-2011, 08:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
S!
The Bf110C-7 was mine Continu0. Annoying was that my reargunner did NOTHING, just sat there with gun in transit position. And before I could take control was too late and took a swim in the Channel Nevertheless, a kill is a kill Grats on the first ones and let there be a lot more!
|
|
#10
10-26-2011, 10:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Krupi I suggested Rads both full open to keep things common to all who test and ensure the conditions are exactly the same for each test. Playing with some in between rad setting will compromise the validity of the comparison as no one else can exactely match any other setting. Keep things simple and constant. I proposed the test and stated the conditions. How about just flying it as suggested. Then repeat it using whatever Rad settings you want. document both.
The purpose of the test is to determine the difference between AUTO and MANUAL prop pitch... nothing else. The claim made by Krupi was that you could achieve at least 50Kmh better in MANUAL. Exact top speed is not important in this test just the difference (if any ) between AUTO and MANUAL. Last edited by IvanK; 10-26-2011 at 10:43 AM.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
