Luthier Update Clarification Please

[robtek]

As said before, dx11 support is different from featuring dx11 effects.

But that is how one WANTS to interpret! You can accept it or you can get riled up about it, to no avail, btw.

But anyway, why get so riled about things of the past? It's history, not changeable.

It is never wise to hold grudges too long, always leading to problems and escalations out of proportion.

As almost everybody agrees atm we have a working, in no way perfect, sim here, still filling us with great expectations.

So, let us unite our voices for a better future. (gosh, doesn't that sound soupy?)

[kendo65]

Originally Posted by robtek

As said before, dx11 support is different from featuring dx11 effects.

...

Sorry Robtek. This is a red herring and a misinterpretation.

DX11 support IS exactly the same in the context in which it is used here as 'featuring DX11 effects'.

[LoBiSoMeM]

Originally Posted by kendo65

Sorry Robtek. This is a red herring and a misinterpretation.

DX11 support IS exactly the same in the context in which it is used here as 'featuring DX11 effects'.

Yes, it's simple, let's move on!

Dx11 and Dx10.1 support is planned for future patches, obviously. To gain almost 50% in performance without losing visual quality MG need to use all DirectX potential.

[robtek]

Originally Posted by kendo65

Sorry Robtek. This is a red herring and a misinterpretation.

DX11 support IS exactly the same in the context in which it is used here as 'featuring DX11 effects'.

Misinterpretation by whom? I'd say its you, but then : however.