Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: Do we need new trees?
Yes, current ones are glittering and have no collision model. 71 47.65%
No, but the collison model added. 60 40.27%
No, they are fine. 8 5.37%
Don't mind the trees. 10 6.71%
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2011, 11:38 AM
jg27_mc jg27_mc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Porto Santo Island, Portugal
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
I would like to say im from portugal and likewise you i have an opinion who happens to be different from yours, visuals improve the FLIGHT sim otherwise we would have stayed with 1946 with a CEM remoddeling.

i would fix a smiley for you, but i dont want to be rude.

have a nice day.
errr... Your opinion doesn't count. Everyone knows Portugal is DOOMED!

j/k

A few thoughts:

RoF trees are not perfect, but they offer a good compromise between visual aspect, good FPS and DM.

I am grounded (for the last 3 months + -, I was bored to death with the performance/bug issues) but last time I tried it, trees were an FPS hog for the overall quality they offered...

~S~
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2011, 01:22 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Talking

No one Tree is enough ...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-15-2011, 02:53 PM
T}{OR's Avatar
T}{OR T}{OR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 833
Default

Voted yes because of no collision model.
__________________

LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron
'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2011, 03:15 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yeah, we need collision model for trees more than we need new trees....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2011, 03:40 PM
sport02 sport02 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25
Default

collision model + more than one type of trees ( different type of trees and shrub or bush should be interesting for diversity )

always the same trees on all the map is monotone

i think it' s lake that choice in your option answers

Last edited by sport02; 10-15-2011 at 03:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.